The Built Environment, Political Orientation & Personality: Preferences and Sense of Place Development

One of the most crucial ways in which an individual defines their physical environment is through forming a sense of place (SOP). Previous work has investigated the ways in which both new and old built environments have played a major role in defining “place”, separate from “space”. However, the suburb, a more modern conception of built environment heavily reliant on auto-centric design, has been conceived to remove place from community design, designating such areas as “placeless”. Therefore, because individuals prefer places that align with their personalities and political beliefs, we predict that individuals will demonstrate the least preference towards suburban built environments due to their high concentration of transportation-centric design. Results demonstrate that, while there exists little difference in preferences between urban, suburban, and rural environments, individuals have stronger and more positive preferences towards human-centric design as opposed to transportation-centric design, largely based upon their dominant personality domains and political preferences. Such results indicate that individuals do prefer built environments based upon the traits they possess, with human-centric environments emphasizing the underlying traits of urban, suburban, and rural built environments.

Publication Details

Journal
W&M Publish (College of William & Mary)
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Built Environment, Political Orientation & Personality: Preferences and Sense of Place Development

W&M Publish (College of William & Mary)
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
article

The Built Environment, Political Orientation & Personality: Preferences and Sense of Place Development

article en

Abstract

One of the most crucial ways in which an individual defines their physical environment is through forming a sense of place (SOP). Previous work has investigated the ways in which both new and old built environments have played a major role in defining “place”, separate from “space”. However, the suburb, a more modern conception of built environment heavily reliant on auto-centric design, has been conceived to remove place from community design, designating such areas as “placeless”. Therefore, because individuals prefer places that align with their personalities and political beliefs, we predict that individuals will demonstrate the least preference towards suburban built environments due to their high concentration of transportation-centric design. Results demonstrate that, while there exists little difference in preferences between urban, suburban, and rural environments, individuals have stronger and more positive preferences towards human-centric design as opposed to transportation-centric design, largely based upon their dominant personality domains and political preferences. Such results indicate that individuals do prefer built environments based upon the traits they possess, with human-centric environments emphasizing the underlying traits of urban, suburban, and rural built environments.

W&M Publish (College of William & Mary)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.