Book review: War as Protection and Punishment: Armed International Intervention at the ‘End of History’ by Teresa Degenhardt

Teresa Degenhardt's War as Protection and Punishment offers a crucial lens for understanding and critiquing how penal discourses animate the justification and operation of contemporary warfare. Examining three post-Cold War military interventions – in Kosovo, Iraq, and Libya – Degenhardt demonstrates that war, especially when waged to rescue victims of mass atrocities, embodies an unquestioned desire to punish and control the behaviour of perceived criminal groups within the international sphere. These insights remain strikingly relevant today, as political leaders and media outlets continue to justify military action – for example, Israel's campaign in Gaza or Russia's aggression against Ukraine – not only through the language of international law (e.g. self-defence) but also through the language of retribution. These punitive discourses, often invoking the necessity of collective punishment, reveal not only the violent intentions of those who articulate them but also how the emotional drive to punish wrongdoings is enacted through military intervention.

Publication Details

Journal
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Published
2025-11-07
Primary Topic
War, Ethics, and Justification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Book review: War as Protection and Punishment: Armed International Intervention at the ‘End of History’ by Teresa Degenhardt

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
War, Ethics, and Justification
article

Book review: War as Protection and Punishment: Armed International Intervention at the ‘End of History’ by Teresa Degenhardt

article en

Abstract

Teresa Degenhardt's War as Protection and Punishment offers a crucial lens for understanding and critiquing how penal discourses animate the justification and operation of contemporary warfare. Examining three post-Cold War military interventions – in Kosovo, Iraq, and Libya – Degenhardt demonstrates that war, especially when waged to rescue victims of mass atrocities, embodies an unquestioned desire to punish and control the behaviour of perceived criminal groups within the international sphere. These insights remain strikingly relevant today, as political leaders and media outlets continue to justify military action – for example, Israel's campaign in Gaza or Russia's aggression against Ukraine – not only through the language of international law (e.g. self-defence) but also through the language of retribution. These punitive discourses, often invoking the necessity of collective punishment, reveal not only the violent intentions of those who articulate them but also how the emotional drive to punish wrongdoings is enacted through military intervention.

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
War, Ethics, and Justification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.