Can the variance in DP World Tour Golfers’ drive distance be predicted from kinetic variables during a countermovement jump and isometric mid-thigh pull?

<p dir="ltr">In recent years, a growing body of research has investigated the relationships clubhead velocity has with kinetic variables during a countermovement jump (CMJ) and isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP). However, to date, no research has investigated the relationships these kinetic variables have with real-world drive distance (DD) in elite DP World Tour golfers. The purpose of this investigation was to assess if CMJ positive impulse (PI), CMJ net impulse (NI), IMTP peak force (PF), force at 200 milliseconds, force at 250 milliseconds, and force at 300 milliseconds could predict the variance in elite DP World Tour golfers DD during a real-world tournament season. Twenty-five DP World Tour golfers performed CMJs and IMTPs on force plates in a real-world setting, with DD assessed using DP World Tour statistics. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to assess if kinetic variables significantly predicted the variance in DP World Tour Golfers' DD. Statistical significance for this investigation was set at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05 with effect size determined using the <i>f</i><sup><em>2</em></sup> statistic. The results of the investigation note that model 2 (CMJ PI and CMJ NI) was the best fit, significantly predicting (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.279, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) the variance in DP World Tour Golfers' DD, which represented a large effect size (<i>f</i><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.39). These findings support the use of CMJ PI and CMJ NI when physically profiling elite golfers. In addition, strength and conditioning practitioners should consider utilizing modalities aimed at increasing CMJ impulse when working with golfers.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-25
Primary Topic
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can the variance in DP World Tour Golfers’ drive distance be predicted from kinetic variables during a countermovement jump and isometric mid-thigh pull?

Figshare
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
article

Can the variance in DP World Tour Golfers’ drive distance be predicted from kinetic variables during a countermovement jump and isometric mid-thigh pull?

article en

Abstract

<p dir="ltr">In recent years, a growing body of research has investigated the relationships clubhead velocity has with kinetic variables during a countermovement jump (CMJ) and isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP). However, to date, no research has investigated the relationships these kinetic variables have with real-world drive distance (DD) in elite DP World Tour golfers. The purpose of this investigation was to assess if CMJ positive impulse (PI), CMJ net impulse (NI), IMTP peak force (PF), force at 200 milliseconds, force at 250 milliseconds, and force at 300 milliseconds could predict the variance in elite DP World Tour golfers DD during a real-world tournament season. Twenty-five DP World Tour golfers performed CMJs and IMTPs on force plates in a real-world setting, with DD assessed using DP World Tour statistics. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to assess if kinetic variables significantly predicted the variance in DP World Tour Golfers' DD. Statistical significance for this investigation was set at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05 with effect size determined using the <i>f</i><sup><em>2</em></sup> statistic. The results of the investigation note that model 2 (CMJ PI and CMJ NI) was the best fit, significantly predicting (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.279, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) the variance in DP World Tour Golfers' DD, which represented a large effect size (<i>f</i><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.39). These findings support the use of CMJ PI and CMJ NI when physically profiling elite golfers. In addition, strength and conditioning practitioners should consider utilizing modalities aimed at increasing CMJ impulse when working with golfers.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.