Belial: Sexual Violence and Its Legal Remediation in the Deuteronomistic History

At first glance, the pericopes of Judges 19–20, 1 Samuel 2:12–36, and 1 Samuel 30 have little in common with one another. Yet, several peculiar threads are interwoven in each pericope that signal a common bond between these narratives. In each account, the characterization of the antagonists and their deeds are the same. In Judg 19–20, בני־בליעל, lit. “sons of belial,” are responsible for the rape of the Levite’s concubine. In 1 Sam 2:12–36, Eli’s sons are called בני־בליעל, lit. “sons of belial,” and accused of exploiting the so-called gathering women. In 1 Sam 30, a portion of David’s men who are called belial (בליעל) make a proposal that capitalizes on the sexual abuse of Israelite daughters in the wake of an Amalekite raid. In addition to the striking correlation of belial and sexual violence against women in each of these pericopes, there are several more peculiarities shared between them. First is the use of belial itself. The uncertain etymology and linguistic ambiguity of the term have famously puzzled interpreters. There is little consensus on its precise meaning, and the various interpretations of the term in later recensions of the biblical text obfuscate the shared usage of the term in these pericopes. Second, although these pericopes are replete with allusions to Pentateuchal legislation, interpreters have not considered a shared motivation underlying the incorporation of these allusions. Finally, although it is widely accepted that editorial activity has significantly shaped each pericope, there has not yet been an attempt to trace common scribal motivations behind their literary development. This study aims to resolve these collective difficulties by arguing that Judg 19–20, 1 Sam 2:12–36, and 1 Sam 30 engaged in shared legal reflection. I propose that the intricate legal themes, allusions to sexual violence, complex text-critical issues, and evocation of belial in Judg 19–20, 1 Sam 2:12–36, and 1 Sam 30 are the product of legal exegesis that sought to correlate belial with sexual violence against women.

Publication Details

Journal
e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University)
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Belial: Sexual Violence and Its Legal Remediation in the Deuteronomistic History

e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University)
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

Belial: Sexual Violence and Its Legal Remediation in the Deuteronomistic History

article en

Abstract

At first glance, the pericopes of Judges 19–20, 1 Samuel 2:12–36, and 1 Samuel 30 have little in common with one another. Yet, several peculiar threads are interwoven in each pericope that signal a common bond between these narratives. In each account, the characterization of the antagonists and their deeds are the same. In Judg 19–20, בני־בליעל, lit. “sons of belial,” are responsible for the rape of the Levite’s concubine. In 1 Sam 2:12–36, Eli’s sons are called בני־בליעל, lit. “sons of belial,” and accused of exploiting the so-called gathering women. In 1 Sam 30, a portion of David’s men who are called belial (בליעל) make a proposal that capitalizes on the sexual abuse of Israelite daughters in the wake of an Amalekite raid. In addition to the striking correlation of belial and sexual violence against women in each of these pericopes, there are several more peculiarities shared between them. First is the use of belial itself. The uncertain etymology and linguistic ambiguity of the term have famously puzzled interpreters. There is little consensus on its precise meaning, and the various interpretations of the term in later recensions of the biblical text obfuscate the shared usage of the term in these pericopes. Second, although these pericopes are replete with allusions to Pentateuchal legislation, interpreters have not considered a shared motivation underlying the incorporation of these allusions. Finally, although it is widely accepted that editorial activity has significantly shaped each pericope, there has not yet been an attempt to trace common scribal motivations behind their literary development. This study aims to resolve these collective difficulties by arguing that Judg 19–20, 1 Sam 2:12–36, and 1 Sam 30 engaged in shared legal reflection. I propose that the intricate legal themes, allusions to sexual violence, complex text-critical issues, and evocation of belial in Judg 19–20, 1 Sam 2:12–36, and 1 Sam 30 are the product of legal exegesis that sought to correlate belial with sexual violence against women.

e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.