Assessing Various Methods of Social Media Use to Combat Vaccine Hesitancy

Science is no stranger to skeptics, and vaccine technology has proven no exception to being immune from detractors since the inception of inoculation (Lanzarotta, 2024). At first, people questioned vaccine safety and efficacy, fearing contraction of disease. Public trust in vaccination gained traction with such successes as the polio vaccine, but the Wakefield article published in 1998 falsely linked the MMR vaccine to autism, arguably launching modern vaccine skepticism (Motta & Stecula, 2021). It was retracted twelve years after publication following refutation by evidence-based research, but not before increasing internet speeds allowed for the dissemination and proliferation of vaccine misinformation. The World Health Organization now considers vaccine skepticism a top ten threat to public health (LaCour & Davis, 2020). As such, combatting misinformation should be considered a public health priority. This study aims to compare different approaches to combatting vaccine hesitancy and identify the most effective methods to reduce vaccine skepticism and increase herd immunity.

Publication Details

Journal
DigitalCommons@Linfield (Linfield College)
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Various Methods of Social Media Use to Combat Vaccine Hesitancy

DigitalCommons@Linfield (Linfield College)
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Assessing Various Methods of Social Media Use to Combat Vaccine Hesitancy

article en

Abstract

Science is no stranger to skeptics, and vaccine technology has proven no exception to being immune from detractors since the inception of inoculation (Lanzarotta, 2024). At first, people questioned vaccine safety and efficacy, fearing contraction of disease. Public trust in vaccination gained traction with such successes as the polio vaccine, but the Wakefield article published in 1998 falsely linked the MMR vaccine to autism, arguably launching modern vaccine skepticism (Motta & Stecula, 2021). It was retracted twelve years after publication following refutation by evidence-based research, but not before increasing internet speeds allowed for the dissemination and proliferation of vaccine misinformation. The World Health Organization now considers vaccine skepticism a top ten threat to public health (LaCour & Davis, 2020). As such, combatting misinformation should be considered a public health priority. This study aims to compare different approaches to combatting vaccine hesitancy and identify the most effective methods to reduce vaccine skepticism and increase herd immunity.

DigitalCommons@Linfield (Linfield College)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.