Artificial Intelligence in Optometry: Current and Future Perspectives

Anantha Krishnan,1,* Ananya Dutta,2,* Alok Srivastava,3,4 Nagaraju Konda,1 Ruby Kala Prakasam5 1School of Medical Sciences, Science Complex, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India; 2Standard Chartered – LVPEI Academy for Eye Care Education, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India; 3L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India; 4Sri Innovation and Research Foundation, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India; 5Standard Chartered – LVPEI Academy for Eye Care Education, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Gullapalli Pratibha Rao Campus, Hyderabad, Telangana, India*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Ruby Kala Prakasam, Standard Chartered – LVPEI Academy for Eye Care Education, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Gullapalli Pratibha Rao Campus, Kismathpur, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500 086, India, Email [email protected] Nagaraju Konda, School of Medical Sciences, Science complex, University of Hyderabad, CR Rao Road, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500046, India, Email [email protected]: With the global shortage of eye care professionals and the increasing burden of vision impairment, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, there is an urgent need for innovative solutions to bridge gaps in eye care services. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) over recent decades have significantly impacted healthcare, including the field of optometry. When integrated into optometric workflows, AI has the potential to streamline decision-making processes and enhance system efficiency. To realize this potential, it is essential to develop AI models that can improve each stage of the patient care workflow, including screening, detection, diagnosis, and management. This review explores the application of AI in optometry, focusing on its potential to optimize various aspects of patient care. We examined AI models across key areas in optometry. Our analysis considered crucial parameters, including model selection, sample sizes for training and validation, evaluation metrics, and the explainability of the models. This comprehensive review identified both the strengths and weaknesses of existing AI models. The majority of image-based studies utilized CNN or transfer learning models, while clinical data-based studies primarily employed RF, SVM, and XGBoost. In general, AI models trained on large datasets achieved higher accuracy. However, many optometry-focused models faced limitations due to insufficient sample sizes— 28% of studies were trained on fewer than 500 samples, 18% used fewer than 200 samples, and over half validated their models on fewer than 500 samples, with 38% validating on fewer than 200. Additionally, some studies that used the same data for both training and validation experienced overfitting, leading to reduced accuracy. Notably, 20% of the included studies reported accuracy below 80%, limiting their practical applicability in clinical settings. This review provides optometrists with valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of AI models in the field, aiding in their informed implementation in clinical settings.Keywords: artificial intelligence, optometry, AI application

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
Primary Topic
Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Optometry: Current and Future Perspectives

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
article

Artificial Intelligence in Optometry: Current and Future Perspectives

article en

Abstract

Anantha Krishnan,1,* Ananya Dutta,2,* Alok Srivastava,3,4 Nagaraju Konda,1 Ruby Kala Prakasam5 1School of Medical Sciences, Science Complex, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India; 2Standard Chartered – LVPEI Academy for Eye Care Education, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India; 3L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India; 4Sri Innovation and Research Foundation, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India; 5Standard Chartered – LVPEI Academy for Eye Care Education, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Gullapalli Pratibha Rao Campus, Hyderabad, Telangana, India*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Ruby Kala Prakasam, Standard Chartered – LVPEI Academy for Eye Care Education, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Gullapalli Pratibha Rao Campus, Kismathpur, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500 086, India, Email [email protected] Nagaraju Konda, School of Medical Sciences, Science complex, University of Hyderabad, CR Rao Road, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500046, India, Email [email protected]: With the global shortage of eye care professionals and the increasing burden of vision impairment, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, there is an urgent need for innovative solutions to bridge gaps in eye care services. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) over recent decades have significantly impacted healthcare, including the field of optometry. When integrated into optometric workflows, AI has the potential to streamline decision-making processes and enhance system efficiency. To realize this potential, it is essential to develop AI models that can improve each stage of the patient care workflow, including screening, detection, diagnosis, and management. This review explores the application of AI in optometry, focusing on its potential to optimize various aspects of patient care. We examined AI models across key areas in optometry. Our analysis considered crucial parameters, including model selection, sample sizes for training and validation, evaluation metrics, and the explainability of the models. This comprehensive review identified both the strengths and weaknesses of existing AI models. The majority of image-based studies utilized CNN or transfer learning models, while clinical data-based studies primarily employed RF, SVM, and XGBoost. In general, AI models trained on large datasets achieved higher accuracy. However, many optometry-focused models faced limitations due to insufficient sample sizes— 28% of studies were trained on fewer than 500 samples, 18% used fewer than 200 samples, and over half validated their models on fewer than 500 samples, with 38% validating on fewer than 200. Additionally, some studies that used the same data for both training and validation experienced overfitting, leading to reduced accuracy. Notably, 20% of the included studies reported accuracy below 80%, limiting their practical applicability in clinical settings. This review provides optometrists with valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of AI models in the field, aiding in their informed implementation in clinical settings.Keywords: artificial intelligence, optometry, AI application

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.