Analysis of the Relationship Between Cervical Cancer Progression and the Microbiome

Yue-Yue Gao,1 Xiao-Xue Li,2 Hui Zuo,2 Ping Zhang3 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, People’s Republic of China; 2Emergency Department, Shijiazhuang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei Yanshan County People’s Hospital, Cangzhou, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Yue-Yue Gao, Email [email protected]: Cervical cancer remains a leading malignancy among women worldwide. Emerging evidence suggests that alterations in the cervical microbiota may influence its development and progression.Objective: To compare the cervical microbiota composition and diversity between cervical cancer patients and healthy women using 16S rRNA gene sequencing.Methods: Between January and June 2024, cervical tissue samples were collected from 40 cervical cancer patients and 40 healthy women. Microbial DNA was extracted and the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced using the Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform. QIIME2 and R software were used for microbial classification and diversity analysis. LEfSe was applied to identify differentially abundant taxa between groups.Results: At the phylum level, Firmicutes dominated the control group (67.91%), while dropped to 31.03% in cervical cancer patients. Actinobacteria (26.22% vs 14.37%) and Proteobacteria (27.61% vs 0.72%) were significantly elevated in the cancer group. At the genus level, Lactobacillus was predominant in controls (46.27%), while reduced in patients, and Rhodococcus and Klebsiella were notably enriched. Alpha diversity (Shannon index) exhibited no significant difference between groups, whereas richness indices (Chao1 and ACE) were significantly higher in the cancer group (p < 0.05). Beta diversity analysis revealed a clear distinction in community structure (t = 10.225, P = 0.001). LEfSe identified Rhodococcus (LDA = 5.24), Klebsiella (LDA = 5.17), and Ralstonia as significantly more abundant in the cancer group, while Firmicutes (LDA = 5.31) was characteristic of the control group.Conclusion: Cervical cancer patients exhibited distinct cervical microbiota profiles, with reduced Firmicutes and elevated Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria. Increased levels of Rhodococcus and Klebsiella suggested a potential association between microbial dysbiosis and cervical cancer. These findings highlight the microbiome’s relevance to tumor biology and support further investigation into its diagnostic and therapeutic potential.Keywords: cervical cancer, microbiome, high-throughput sequencing, alpha diversity, beta diversity, LEfSe analysis

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Gut microbiota and health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the Relationship Between Cervical Cancer Progression and the Microbiome

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Gut microbiota and health
article

Analysis of the Relationship Between Cervical Cancer Progression and the Microbiome

article en

Abstract

Yue-Yue Gao,1 Xiao-Xue Li,2 Hui Zuo,2 Ping Zhang3 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, People’s Republic of China; 2Emergency Department, Shijiazhuang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei Yanshan County People’s Hospital, Cangzhou, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Yue-Yue Gao, Email [email protected]: Cervical cancer remains a leading malignancy among women worldwide. Emerging evidence suggests that alterations in the cervical microbiota may influence its development and progression.Objective: To compare the cervical microbiota composition and diversity between cervical cancer patients and healthy women using 16S rRNA gene sequencing.Methods: Between January and June 2024, cervical tissue samples were collected from 40 cervical cancer patients and 40 healthy women. Microbial DNA was extracted and the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced using the Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform. QIIME2 and R software were used for microbial classification and diversity analysis. LEfSe was applied to identify differentially abundant taxa between groups.Results: At the phylum level, Firmicutes dominated the control group (67.91%), while dropped to 31.03% in cervical cancer patients. Actinobacteria (26.22% vs 14.37%) and Proteobacteria (27.61% vs 0.72%) were significantly elevated in the cancer group. At the genus level, Lactobacillus was predominant in controls (46.27%), while reduced in patients, and Rhodococcus and Klebsiella were notably enriched. Alpha diversity (Shannon index) exhibited no significant difference between groups, whereas richness indices (Chao1 and ACE) were significantly higher in the cancer group (p < 0.05). Beta diversity analysis revealed a clear distinction in community structure (t = 10.225, P = 0.001). LEfSe identified Rhodococcus (LDA = 5.24), Klebsiella (LDA = 5.17), and Ralstonia as significantly more abundant in the cancer group, while Firmicutes (LDA = 5.31) was characteristic of the control group.Conclusion: Cervical cancer patients exhibited distinct cervical microbiota profiles, with reduced Firmicutes and elevated Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria. Increased levels of Rhodococcus and Klebsiella suggested a potential association between microbial dysbiosis and cervical cancer. These findings highlight the microbiome’s relevance to tumor biology and support further investigation into its diagnostic and therapeutic potential.Keywords: cervical cancer, microbiome, high-throughput sequencing, alpha diversity, beta diversity, LEfSe analysis

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Gut microbiota and health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.