Validation and Final Results from the First Cardiac Lead Post-Approval Study Using Real-World Data

Steven Mullane,1 Jacob B Hicks,2 Kazi Sharmin,1 Camden Harrell,1 Angie Rock,1 Crystal Miller1 1BIOTRONIK Inc., Lake Oswego, OR, 97035, USA; 2BIOTRONIK NRO INC., Lake Oswego, OR, 97035, USACorrespondence: Steven Mullane, BIOTRONIK, Inc., 6024 Jean Road, Lake Oswego, OR, 97070, USA, Tel +503-201-3892, Email [email protected]: As part of Electrophysiology Predictable and Sustainable Implementation of National Registries (EP PASSION), a multi-stakeholder collaboration between the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), academic and society partners, and cardiovascular implantable electronic device manufacturers, a 5-year bradycardia lead study transitioned from a traditional post-approval study (PAS) to a real-world data (RWD) approach using a novel method to evaluate chronic cardiac lead complications.Methods: Lead complications were identified using a combination of diagnosis and procedure codes from 2013 to 2020 fee-for-service Medicare claims data along with BIOTRONIK device registration and Medical Device Reporting data from patients implanted between 2013 and 2015 with a Solia S lead. A proof-of-concept analysis was performed using McNemar’s test to compare lead complications reported in the traditional PAS with lead complications identified in the RWD. Kaplan–Meier survival and incidence rates were evaluated to determine real-world long-term safety.Results: The proof-of-concept analysis of 896 patients found in both traditional PAS and RWD sources demonstrated a 99.7% proportion of overall agreement in identifying lead complications (p = 0.0833). Following this validation, 1841 study leads from 1015 Medicare patients were analyzed. A total of 33 lead complications (attributable or possibly attributable to the study lead) were identified for a rate of 0.005 complications per lead-year. The complication-free rate at 5-years post-implant was 97.2% (95% CI: 96.07%, 98.06%).Conclusion: These results led to the first FDA approval for transition of a cardiac lead PAS to long-term safety reporting using RWD, paving the way for future real-world cardiac lead and device surveillance studies.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01791127.Keywords: real-world data, real-world evidence, cardiac lead, pacemaker

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation and Final Results from the First Cardiac Lead Post-Approval Study Using Real-World Data

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
article

Validation and Final Results from the First Cardiac Lead Post-Approval Study Using Real-World Data

article en

Abstract

Steven Mullane,1 Jacob B Hicks,2 Kazi Sharmin,1 Camden Harrell,1 Angie Rock,1 Crystal Miller1 1BIOTRONIK Inc., Lake Oswego, OR, 97035, USA; 2BIOTRONIK NRO INC., Lake Oswego, OR, 97035, USACorrespondence: Steven Mullane, BIOTRONIK, Inc., 6024 Jean Road, Lake Oswego, OR, 97070, USA, Tel +503-201-3892, Email [email protected]: As part of Electrophysiology Predictable and Sustainable Implementation of National Registries (EP PASSION), a multi-stakeholder collaboration between the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), academic and society partners, and cardiovascular implantable electronic device manufacturers, a 5-year bradycardia lead study transitioned from a traditional post-approval study (PAS) to a real-world data (RWD) approach using a novel method to evaluate chronic cardiac lead complications.Methods: Lead complications were identified using a combination of diagnosis and procedure codes from 2013 to 2020 fee-for-service Medicare claims data along with BIOTRONIK device registration and Medical Device Reporting data from patients implanted between 2013 and 2015 with a Solia S lead. A proof-of-concept analysis was performed using McNemar’s test to compare lead complications reported in the traditional PAS with lead complications identified in the RWD. Kaplan–Meier survival and incidence rates were evaluated to determine real-world long-term safety.Results: The proof-of-concept analysis of 896 patients found in both traditional PAS and RWD sources demonstrated a 99.7% proportion of overall agreement in identifying lead complications (p = 0.0833). Following this validation, 1841 study leads from 1015 Medicare patients were analyzed. A total of 33 lead complications (attributable or possibly attributable to the study lead) were identified for a rate of 0.005 complications per lead-year. The complication-free rate at 5-years post-implant was 97.2% (95% CI: 96.07%, 98.06%).Conclusion: These results led to the first FDA approval for transition of a cardiac lead PAS to long-term safety reporting using RWD, paving the way for future real-world cardiac lead and device surveillance studies.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01791127.Keywords: real-world data, real-world evidence, cardiac lead, pacemaker

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.