Using a novel cognitive screening test to identify dementia risk amongst community‐dwelling cognitively unimpaired older adults from underserved populations

Background: Recent studies suggest that among cognitively unimpaired older adults, there are individuals who might present with subtle cognitive impairments suggesting the risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD; Bos et al., 2018). The Visual Short‐Term Memory Binding Test (VSTMBT) identifies older adults who are accumulating AD pathology even though they are otherwise cognitively unimpaired (Parra et al., 2024). We investigated whether community dwellers from different socioeconomic groups above their 60s and displaying subtle VSTMB impairments also present neuropsychological profiles compatible with dementia risk. Methods: A sample of 235 community‐dwelling older adults were assessed with an extensive neuropsychological battery (Bonilla‐Santos et al., 2023) and a sensitive scale of functional abilities (T‐ADLQ; (Muñoz‐Neira et al., 2012). We divided the sample following recent recommendations drawn from the VSTMBT (Parra et al., 2024). We found that out of the total sample, 43 participants were classified as normal binders (performance on two VSTMBT above cut‐off), 99 were classified as suspicious binders (performance on at least one VSTMBT below cut‐off), and 93 were classified as weak binders (performance on both VSTMBT below cut‐off). Results: Group comparisons revealed that relative to normal and suspicious binders, weak binders have poorer performance on cognitive screening tools (MMSE, F(2,230) = 4.01, p = 0.019; ACE‐R F(2,230) = 3.4, p = 0.035) and functional scales (T‐ADLQ, F(2,230) = 4.53, p = 0.012). Such effects were unaccounted for by years of education, gender, socioeconomic status, comorbidities, or toxic habits. Age was a significant predictor with weak binders being older (F(2,234) = 6.31, p = 0.002). Assessment of subjective cognitive experiences (SCD) revealed no group effects (F(2,202) = 0.57, p = 0.566). Standard neuropsychological tests from the CERAD revealed marginal group effects for variables previously acknowledged as markers of AD. Conclusions: The VSTMB test identified AD risk profiles in community‐dwelling older adults from an underserved population. The fact that such a test proved insensitive to gender, education, socioeconomic status, comorbidities and toxic habits, suggests that this assessment tool can be reliably used to identify, in community settings, older adults who are at risk of dementia even if they have not yet complained about their cognitive abilities or sought medical help.

Publication Details

Journal
Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using a novel cognitive screening test to identify dementia risk amongst community‐dwelling cognitively unimpaired older adults from underserved populations

Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
article

Using a novel cognitive screening test to identify dementia risk amongst community‐dwelling cognitively unimpaired older adults from underserved populations

article en

Abstract

Background: Recent studies suggest that among cognitively unimpaired older adults, there are individuals who might present with subtle cognitive impairments suggesting the risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD; Bos et al., 2018). The Visual Short‐Term Memory Binding Test (VSTMBT) identifies older adults who are accumulating AD pathology even though they are otherwise cognitively unimpaired (Parra et al., 2024). We investigated whether community dwellers from different socioeconomic groups above their 60s and displaying subtle VSTMB impairments also present neuropsychological profiles compatible with dementia risk. Methods: A sample of 235 community‐dwelling older adults were assessed with an extensive neuropsychological battery (Bonilla‐Santos et al., 2023) and a sensitive scale of functional abilities (T‐ADLQ; (Muñoz‐Neira et al., 2012). We divided the sample following recent recommendations drawn from the VSTMBT (Parra et al., 2024). We found that out of the total sample, 43 participants were classified as normal binders (performance on two VSTMBT above cut‐off), 99 were classified as suspicious binders (performance on at least one VSTMBT below cut‐off), and 93 were classified as weak binders (performance on both VSTMBT below cut‐off). Results: Group comparisons revealed that relative to normal and suspicious binders, weak binders have poorer performance on cognitive screening tools (MMSE, F(2,230) = 4.01, p = 0.019; ACE‐R F(2,230) = 3.4, p = 0.035) and functional scales (T‐ADLQ, F(2,230) = 4.53, p = 0.012). Such effects were unaccounted for by years of education, gender, socioeconomic status, comorbidities, or toxic habits. Age was a significant predictor with weak binders being older (F(2,234) = 6.31, p = 0.002). Assessment of subjective cognitive experiences (SCD) revealed no group effects (F(2,202) = 0.57, p = 0.566). Standard neuropsychological tests from the CERAD revealed marginal group effects for variables previously acknowledged as markers of AD. Conclusions: The VSTMB test identified AD risk profiles in community‐dwelling older adults from an underserved population. The fact that such a test proved insensitive to gender, education, socioeconomic status, comorbidities and toxic habits, suggests that this assessment tool can be reliably used to identify, in community settings, older adults who are at risk of dementia even if they have not yet complained about their cognitive abilities or sought medical help.

Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.