“Very Little Cause At All”: The Erosion of Job Security for Ohio Teachers

As education becomes an increasingly divisive partisan issue, with teachers caught in the crossfire, it is more important than ever that teachers have protection from unfair or politically-motivated terminations. The Ohio Teacher Tenure Act was enacted 80 years ago to give teachers this essential job security. However, this Note examines the bizarre fact that, after a recent series of state court opinions, the Act now gives Ohio teachers less job security than other unionized public employees. By essentially forbidding adjudicators of teacher terminations from considering proportionality, length of service, and due process, these holdings leave teachers in a far more vulnerable position than other public employees challenging their terminations. This Note argues that these holdings must be rejected not only because they are bad for teachers, but also because they are rooted in faulty legal reasoning, violate the unambiguous legislative intent of both the Ohio Teacher Tenure Act and its amendments, and defy decades of Ohio jurisprudence in favor of granting broad discretion in determining just cause.

Publication Details

Journal
EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University)
Published
2025-04-28
Primary Topic
Legal Issues in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Very Little Cause At All”: The Erosion of Job Security for Ohio Teachers

EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University)
Legal Issues in Education
article

“Very Little Cause At All”: The Erosion of Job Security for Ohio Teachers

article en

Abstract

As education becomes an increasingly divisive partisan issue, with teachers caught in the crossfire, it is more important than ever that teachers have protection from unfair or politically-motivated terminations. The Ohio Teacher Tenure Act was enacted 80 years ago to give teachers this essential job security. However, this Note examines the bizarre fact that, after a recent series of state court opinions, the Act now gives Ohio teachers less job security than other unionized public employees. By essentially forbidding adjudicators of teacher terminations from considering proportionality, length of service, and due process, these holdings leave teachers in a far more vulnerable position than other public employees challenging their terminations. This Note argues that these holdings must be rejected not only because they are bad for teachers, but also because they are rooted in faulty legal reasoning, violate the unambiguous legislative intent of both the Ohio Teacher Tenure Act and its amendments, and defy decades of Ohio jurisprudence in favor of granting broad discretion in determining just cause.

EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Legal Issues in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Very Little Cause At All”: The Erosion of Job Security for Ohio Teachers · EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS