Trusting Co-Intelligence: Method and Case Studies on how to manage Human-AI decision making

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the way we work, necessitating new collaborative models that blend human and AI capabilities. Despite its potential, effective AI deployment is hampered by trust issues. This thesis introduces a novel framework to manage trust in human-AI decision-making, focusing on four key factors: transparency, accountability, similarity, and performance. Grounded in the vast literature on trust (spanning from psychology, computer science and management) and tested across various projects in the education sector and a predictive maintenance context, the framework uses questionnaires and brainstorming sessions to identify enablers and barriers to AI trust, as prerequisite of AI correct usage in projects. The study emphasizes the importance of addressing both technical and social dimensions of trust, providing concrete managerial tools to enhance AI acceptance. The flexible framework can be applied proactively or reactively, making it suitable for different stages of AI projects. Future research should systematically analyse data to identify patterns and guidelines for improving AI trust and deployment strategies.

Publication Details

Journal
Electronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa)
Published
2024-09-27
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trusting Co-Intelligence: Method and Case Studies on how to manage Human-AI decision making

Electronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa)
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Trusting Co-Intelligence: Method and Case Studies on how to manage Human-AI decision making

article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the way we work, necessitating new collaborative models that blend human and AI capabilities. Despite its potential, effective AI deployment is hampered by trust issues. This thesis introduces a novel framework to manage trust in human-AI decision-making, focusing on four key factors: transparency, accountability, similarity, and performance. Grounded in the vast literature on trust (spanning from psychology, computer science and management) and tested across various projects in the education sector and a predictive maintenance context, the framework uses questionnaires and brainstorming sessions to identify enablers and barriers to AI trust, as prerequisite of AI correct usage in projects. The study emphasizes the importance of addressing both technical and social dimensions of trust, providing concrete managerial tools to enhance AI acceptance. The flexible framework can be applied proactively or reactively, making it suitable for different stages of AI projects. Future research should systematically analyse data to identify patterns and guidelines for improving AI trust and deployment strategies.

Electronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.