Theorizing Organizational Change in EHR Implementation

Electronic Health Record (EHR) implementation is recognized as a transformative process in healthcare organizations, reshaping workflows, decision-making, and professional roles. While prior research has examined adoption and success factors, less attention has been given to theorizing the organizational change mechanisms that unfold implementation. Existing studies often rely on deterministic aspects failing to capture the interdependencies between sociotechnical elements. In this paper, we conducted a scoping review of theoretical frameworks used to explain EHR change. Using the scoping review, we categorized these frameworks into organizational change models, configurational perspectives, institutional perspectives, decision-making theories, adoption models, and cognitive theories. Our findings reveal a key gap: existing theorization overlooks the relational dynamics among technology, actors, and organizational structures. We argue that a broader sociotechnical orientation is the appropriate approach to fully understand how EHRs bring about change over time, contributing to the digital transformation literature in healthcare.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theorizing Organizational Change in EHR Implementation

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

Theorizing Organizational Change in EHR Implementation

article en

Abstract

Electronic Health Record (EHR) implementation is recognized as a transformative process in healthcare organizations, reshaping workflows, decision-making, and professional roles. While prior research has examined adoption and success factors, less attention has been given to theorizing the organizational change mechanisms that unfold implementation. Existing studies often rely on deterministic aspects failing to capture the interdependencies between sociotechnical elements. In this paper, we conducted a scoping review of theoretical frameworks used to explain EHR change. Using the scoping review, we categorized these frameworks into organizational change models, configurational perspectives, institutional perspectives, decision-making theories, adoption models, and cognitive theories. Our findings reveal a key gap: existing theorization overlooks the relational dynamics among technology, actors, and organizational structures. We argue that a broader sociotechnical orientation is the appropriate approach to fully understand how EHRs bring about change over time, contributing to the digital transformation literature in healthcare.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Western University (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Theorizing Organizational Change in EHR Implementation · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS