The Struggles for Equality and Democracy in Modern China: Which Was More Influential?

This paper analyzes the struggles for democracy and equality in modern China, from the fall of the Qing Dynasty to the Tiananmen Square movement. It considers which struggle was more influential, evaluating the recurring theme of a fight for democracy in China since the New Culture Movement, and a quest for social and economic equality that Mao and the Chinese Communist Party committed themselves to. Ultimately, the paper concludes that the struggle for democratic norms and institutions was always present among the Chinese people, but it did not succeed in pushing the government or the Party to adopt political reforms. Social and economic equality, however, was a more pressing goal for the Party, but the poverty that state policy sometimes caused made it only slightly more successful than campaigns for democracy. Ultimately, Deng Xiaoping's turn towards economic liberalization would propel China's economic growth and output, and improve the economic status of the people.

Publication Details

Journal
CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Struggles for Equality and Democracy in Modern China: Which Was More Influential?

CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
article

The Struggles for Equality and Democracy in Modern China: Which Was More Influential?

article en

Abstract

This paper analyzes the struggles for democracy and equality in modern China, from the fall of the Qing Dynasty to the Tiananmen Square movement. It considers which struggle was more influential, evaluating the recurring theme of a fight for democracy in China since the New Culture Movement, and a quest for social and economic equality that Mao and the Chinese Communist Party committed themselves to. Ultimately, the paper concludes that the struggle for democratic norms and institutions was always present among the Chinese people, but it did not succeed in pushing the government or the Party to adopt political reforms. Social and economic equality, however, was a more pressing goal for the Party, but the poverty that state policy sometimes caused made it only slightly more successful than campaigns for democracy. Ultimately, Deng Xiaoping's turn towards economic liberalization would propel China's economic growth and output, and improve the economic status of the people.

CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.