The Social Aspects of Sustainable Development: Transit-Oriented Development and Gentrification in Washington, D.C.

Since the early-1970s, Transit oriented development (TOD) has been touted as a solution to a variety of urban problems, including traffic congestion, air pollution, and urban poverty. Subsequently, urban scholars have scrutinized “green” development like TOD to measure potential social costs – like the displacement of incumbent neighborhood residents. However, the methodological approach of these empirical studies has come under scrutiny recently, questioning the connection between gentrification and TOD. Following critics’ calls for a better understanding of who may be impacted by TOD, my project addresses previous studies’ methodological shortcomings by focusing on the socioeconomic characteristics of neighborhood residents rather than property values to measure gentrification. I employ statistical analyses on the Longitudinal Tract Database provided by Brown University to investigate the extent to which Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority’s TOD projects have induced or accelerated displacement in Washington, DC. This paper can aid policy makers and urban planners seeking to ensure that sustainable development does not impose excessive burdens on some in society.

Publication Details

Journal
The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College (Gettysburg College)
Published
2024-09-13
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Social Aspects of Sustainable Development: Transit-Oriented Development and Gentrification in Washington, D.C.

The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College (Gettysburg College)
Urban Planning and Governance
article

The Social Aspects of Sustainable Development: Transit-Oriented Development and Gentrification in Washington, D.C.

article en

Abstract

Since the early-1970s, Transit oriented development (TOD) has been touted as a solution to a variety of urban problems, including traffic congestion, air pollution, and urban poverty. Subsequently, urban scholars have scrutinized “green” development like TOD to measure potential social costs – like the displacement of incumbent neighborhood residents. However, the methodological approach of these empirical studies has come under scrutiny recently, questioning the connection between gentrification and TOD. Following critics’ calls for a better understanding of who may be impacted by TOD, my project addresses previous studies’ methodological shortcomings by focusing on the socioeconomic characteristics of neighborhood residents rather than property values to measure gentrification. I employ statistical analyses on the Longitudinal Tract Database provided by Brown University to investigate the extent to which Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority’s TOD projects have induced or accelerated displacement in Washington, DC. This paper can aid policy makers and urban planners seeking to ensure that sustainable development does not impose excessive burdens on some in society.

The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College (Gettysburg College)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.