Public Perceptions Surrounding Dairy Calf Disbudding Practices on Texas Farms

Public attitudes towards animal welfare significantly influence perceptions of livestock management practices, including dairy calf disbudding. This study explores how demographic factors, dietary habits, educational background, and income levels shape public perceptions on two commonly disbudding techniques, hot-iron and caustic paste. Responses from a diverse sample of Texas residents were analyzed utilizing a quantitative approach and a mixed-methods approach for the questionnaire to assess preferences regarding these procedures. The results indicate that most participants believed caustic paste was the most humane oriented option, mainly due to concerns about the pain and distress associated with hot-iron disbudding. Additionally, exposure to images of these procedures impacted consumer behaviors, with hot-iron disbudding generating stronger negative reactions and greater opposition to consuming or purchasing beef meat. This study emphasizes the importance of education and transparency in dairy production management. Public perceptions were shaped by attitudes toward animal welfare, social influences, and the access to accurate science-based information about disbudding techniques. We suggest that future research explores how educational initiatives and media influence consumer perceptions and promote informed decision-making regarding animal welfare in dairy cattle production.