Perspective on Multidimensional Maturity Models – Results from a Literature Review

This paper explores the state of multidimensional maturity models in digital transformation, focusing on theoretical foundations, methodological approaches, and practical relevance. A systematic review reveals a persistent reliance on linear, stage-based models that often fail to capture parallel or asynchronous development of organizational capabilities. Although many authors advocate multidimensional perspectives, existing models typically collapse dimensions into aggregate scores, obscuring critical interdependencies. Weighting protocols, especially those tailored to specific industries or strategic goals, remain scarce, risking undervaluation of key transformation aspects and suboptimal resource allocation. Furthermore, empirical rigor of the studies is inconsistent. While some models undergo solid validation, others rest primarily on theoretical arguments, limiting credibility. The review underscores an urgent need for clarity in defining and operationalizing “multidimensionality.” Future research should account for dynamic interactions across dimensions and employ context-sensitive weighting. Ultimately, moving beyond linearity will enable more targeted maturity assessments, offering actionable insights to drive sustainable digital transformation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspective on Multidimensional Maturity Models – Results from a Literature Review

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Digital Transformation in Industry
article

Perspective on Multidimensional Maturity Models – Results from a Literature Review

article en

Abstract

This paper explores the state of multidimensional maturity models in digital transformation, focusing on theoretical foundations, methodological approaches, and practical relevance. A systematic review reveals a persistent reliance on linear, stage-based models that often fail to capture parallel or asynchronous development of organizational capabilities. Although many authors advocate multidimensional perspectives, existing models typically collapse dimensions into aggregate scores, obscuring critical interdependencies. Weighting protocols, especially those tailored to specific industries or strategic goals, remain scarce, risking undervaluation of key transformation aspects and suboptimal resource allocation. Furthermore, empirical rigor of the studies is inconsistent. While some models undergo solid validation, others rest primarily on theoretical arguments, limiting credibility. The review underscores an urgent need for clarity in defining and operationalizing “multidimensionality.” Future research should account for dynamic interactions across dimensions and employ context-sensitive weighting. Ultimately, moving beyond linearity will enable more targeted maturity assessments, offering actionable insights to drive sustainable digital transformation.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Hochschule Aalen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Digital Transformation in Industry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perspective on Multidimensional Maturity Models – Results from a Literature Review · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS