Measure With Care! An Integrative Perspective of EU Digital Government Benchmarking

Advancement and quality of Digital Government (DG) are located among the essential factors in the EU policies’ effectiveness, hence the high relevance of their informed assessment. From a global perspective, all EU Member States represent a very high level of DG development. Within this group, however, the differences are significant. Also, different DG measurement instruments happen to yield results incompatible with one another. In this study, we analyze the concepts and design of three established benchmarking projects — EU’s eGovernment Benchmark, UN’s E-Government Survey, and OECD’s Digital Government Index. Then, we transform and combine their indicators’ recent data for most EU Member States to propose the first iteration of a synthetic “meta-indicator” of DG development (DGBAL), and argue that through the adoption of such an approach, peculiarities and nuances of specific instruments are mitigated for the sake of a credible data-based, but more balanced and comprehensive insight into countries’ DG performance.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-06-18
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measure With Care! An Integrative Perspective of EU Digital Government Benchmarking

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
E-Government and Public Services
article

Measure With Care! An Integrative Perspective of EU Digital Government Benchmarking

article en

Abstract

Advancement and quality of Digital Government (DG) are located among the essential factors in the EU policies’ effectiveness, hence the high relevance of their informed assessment. From a global perspective, all EU Member States represent a very high level of DG development. Within this group, however, the differences are significant. Also, different DG measurement instruments happen to yield results incompatible with one another. In this study, we analyze the concepts and design of three established benchmarking projects — EU’s eGovernment Benchmark, UN’s E-Government Survey, and OECD’s Digital Government Index. Then, we transform and combine their indicators’ recent data for most EU Member States to propose the first iteration of a synthetic “meta-indicator” of DG development (DGBAL), and argue that through the adoption of such an approach, peculiarities and nuances of specific instruments are mitigated for the sake of a credible data-based, but more balanced and comprehensive insight into countries’ DG performance.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.