Managing Simulation Uncertainty in Percentiles and Value-at-Risk

Accurate estimates of simulation uncertainty around percentiles and Value-at-Risk (VaR) measures are important for various practical applications in insurance, pensions and banking. Managing simulation uncertainty requires using an adequate number of scenarios to produce reliable risk estimates. The simplest approach for determining simulation uncertainty would be to reperform the calculations many times (with a different seed or via bootstrapping) and measure the variation in the outcomes of the re-simulated estimates. However, given that in practice often 100,000 scenarios or more are used, this approach is quite impractical. In this article we describe an alternative method based on an ‘in-sample’ estimate of the simulation error. This ‘in-sample’ estimate relies solely on the original simulations to determine the uncertainty around the percentile, making it practical to compute.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Publications (Maastricht University)
Published
2024-10-01
Primary Topic
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing Simulation Uncertainty in Percentiles and Value-at-Risk

Research Publications (Maastricht University)
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
article

Managing Simulation Uncertainty in Percentiles and Value-at-Risk

article en

Abstract

Accurate estimates of simulation uncertainty around percentiles and Value-at-Risk (VaR) measures are important for various practical applications in insurance, pensions and banking. Managing simulation uncertainty requires using an adequate number of scenarios to produce reliable risk estimates. The simplest approach for determining simulation uncertainty would be to reperform the calculations many times (with a different seed or via bootstrapping) and measure the variation in the outcomes of the re-simulated estimates. However, given that in practice often 100,000 scenarios or more are used, this approach is quite impractical. In this article we describe an alternative method based on an ‘in-sample’ estimate of the simulation error. This ‘in-sample’ estimate relies solely on the original simulations to determine the uncertainty around the percentile, making it practical to compute.

Research Publications (Maastricht University)
Management Center Innsbruck (AT), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Managing Simulation Uncertainty in Percentiles and Value-at-Risk · Research Publications (Maastricht University) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS