Liberty and the Legal Services Act: the new qualifying regime for solicitors in England

Seeking to assure consistent standards, and to promote diversity, the solicitors’ profession in England has adopted two different approaches to qualification, terminating in a capstone examination. One is by a funded government apprenticeship of 5-6 years, and the other is almost entirely open. Candidates in the latter may in principle choose how to prepare for the examinations and compile the necessary work experience in up to four different organisations. This article shows how the two routes are characterised by different concepts of ‘liberty’. Further, it uses Fraser’s axis of recognition and retribution and Young’s concept of oppression to interrogate the extent to which each is capable of contributing to a statutory obligation to promote diversity in the profession. Whilst there are overlaps, it concludes that, in principle, an apprentice achieves qualification because of their job, but a candidate in the open route may need to do so despite their job.

Publication Details

Journal
Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository)
Published
2024-10-17
Primary Topic
Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liberty and the Legal Services Act: the new qualifying regime for solicitors in England

Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository)
Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
article

Liberty and the Legal Services Act: the new qualifying regime for solicitors in England

article en

Abstract

Seeking to assure consistent standards, and to promote diversity, the solicitors’ profession in England has adopted two different approaches to qualification, terminating in a capstone examination. One is by a funded government apprenticeship of 5-6 years, and the other is almost entirely open. Candidates in the latter may in principle choose how to prepare for the examinations and compile the necessary work experience in up to four different organisations. This article shows how the two routes are characterised by different concepts of ‘liberty’. Further, it uses Fraser’s axis of recognition and retribution and Young’s concept of oppression to interrogate the extent to which each is capable of contributing to a statutory obligation to promote diversity in the profession. Whilst there are overlaps, it concludes that, in principle, an apprentice achieves qualification because of their job, but a candidate in the open route may need to do so despite their job.

Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.