Integrating Bioethics into Public Policy: Lessons from Mongolia’s COVID-19 Response

This research explores the intersection of bioethics and public administration by analyzing Mongolia’s governmental response during the COVID-19 pandemic. It examines how border closures, quarantines, and freedom restrictions impacted human rights and whether ethical standards were upheld. Using the four core principles of bioethics—autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice—the study reveals gaps in ethical oversight and the lack of professional input in decision-making. The paper argues for institutionalizing ethics in policy frameworks. “Public policy decisions during pandemics are often made under pressure, leaving little room for ethical deliberation. Understanding the moral implications of such decisions is crucial for protecting rights, ensuring equity, and improving trust in governance systems." Keywords: Bioethics, Public Policy, Mongolia, COVID-19, Human Rights, Emergency Governance DOI: 10.7176/PPAR/15-1-06 Publication date: April 30th 2025

Publication Details

Journal
Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform)
Published
2025-02-05
Primary Topic
Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Bioethics into Public Policy: Lessons from Mongolia’s COVID-19 Response

Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform)
Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
article

Integrating Bioethics into Public Policy: Lessons from Mongolia’s COVID-19 Response

article en

Abstract

This research explores the intersection of bioethics and public administration by analyzing Mongolia’s governmental response during the COVID-19 pandemic. It examines how border closures, quarantines, and freedom restrictions impacted human rights and whether ethical standards were upheld. Using the four core principles of bioethics—autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice—the study reveals gaps in ethical oversight and the lack of professional input in decision-making. The paper argues for institutionalizing ethics in policy frameworks. “Public policy decisions during pandemics are often made under pressure, leaving little room for ethical deliberation. Understanding the moral implications of such decisions is crucial for protecting rights, ensuring equity, and improving trust in governance systems." Keywords: Bioethics, Public Policy, Mongolia, COVID-19, Human Rights, Emergency Governance DOI: 10.7176/PPAR/15-1-06 Publication date: April 30th 2025

Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.