Interweaving Computationally Intensive Theory Creation and Design Science Research

Design Science Research (DSR) has emerged as a robust methodology for addressing complex real-world problems through the creation and evaluation of innovative technical artifacts (Hevner et al., 2004; Peffers et al., 2007). Computational DSR has become an increasingly prevalent paradigm in Information Systems (IS) research due to the exponential growth in data availability, computational resources, and advancements in algorithms to solve contemporary challenges that are challenging to solve using traditional methods. These technological advancements have also spearheaded the Computationally Intensive Theory Creation (CITC) framework (Berente et al., 2019; Miranda et al., 2022) which outlines how computational methods and data sources can be used to create new theoretical insights. DSR is characterized by multifaceted interactions that drive the iterative development of artefacts. While existing theory can be used to frame and contextualize these dynamic interactions, the design process may also reveal patterns that lead to the creation of novel theory. These theories can come from multiple disciplines as DSR is multidisciplinary in nature; likewise, DSR capitalizes on this pluralism to draw methodological approaches from multiple fields. CITC complements DSR’s iterative and multidisciplinary nature as CITC’s core principles are centered around reflexivity, methodological pluralism, and epistemic attention to all research operations. CITC can complement DSR through its core principles; reflexivity is aligned with iterative improvement during the research process, methodological pluralism in CITC supports DSR’s multidisciplinary nature, and epistemic attention ensures rigorous scrutiny of each stage in the DSR process, enriching the validity and robustness of DSR-generated artefacts. In addition, CITC’s lexical framing and pattern surfacing are techniques can improve the DSR process and enhance theory building by providing a framework to follow. CITC’s stopping rules can ensure methodological rigor, computational efficiency, and theoretical robustness of theoretical artefacts created in the DSR process (Miranda et al., 2022).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-16
Primary Topic
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interweaving Computationally Intensive Theory Creation and Design Science Research

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
article

Interweaving Computationally Intensive Theory Creation and Design Science Research

article en

Abstract

Design Science Research (DSR) has emerged as a robust methodology for addressing complex real-world problems through the creation and evaluation of innovative technical artifacts (Hevner et al., 2004; Peffers et al., 2007). Computational DSR has become an increasingly prevalent paradigm in Information Systems (IS) research due to the exponential growth in data availability, computational resources, and advancements in algorithms to solve contemporary challenges that are challenging to solve using traditional methods. These technological advancements have also spearheaded the Computationally Intensive Theory Creation (CITC) framework (Berente et al., 2019; Miranda et al., 2022) which outlines how computational methods and data sources can be used to create new theoretical insights. DSR is characterized by multifaceted interactions that drive the iterative development of artefacts. While existing theory can be used to frame and contextualize these dynamic interactions, the design process may also reveal patterns that lead to the creation of novel theory. These theories can come from multiple disciplines as DSR is multidisciplinary in nature; likewise, DSR capitalizes on this pluralism to draw methodological approaches from multiple fields. CITC complements DSR’s iterative and multidisciplinary nature as CITC’s core principles are centered around reflexivity, methodological pluralism, and epistemic attention to all research operations. CITC can complement DSR through its core principles; reflexivity is aligned with iterative improvement during the research process, methodological pluralism in CITC supports DSR’s multidisciplinary nature, and epistemic attention ensures rigorous scrutiny of each stage in the DSR process, enriching the validity and robustness of DSR-generated artefacts. In addition, CITC’s lexical framing and pattern surfacing are techniques can improve the DSR process and enhance theory building by providing a framework to follow. CITC’s stopping rules can ensure methodological rigor, computational efficiency, and theoretical robustness of theoretical artefacts created in the DSR process (Miranda et al., 2022).

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
University of Auckland (NZ)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.