Jung’s Kant: Between Philosophical Inspiration and Creative Misinterpretation

This paper examines the influence of Immanuel Kant’s epistemology and aesthetics on Carl Gustav Jung’s depth psychology, particularly with regard to the concept of archetypes. Kant’s division between the noumenal and phenomenal realms mirrors Jung’s view of the unconscious as a structuring force in human cognition. Jung adopted Kantian ideas through his own primary reading, but also from sources such as Carl du Prel and Arthur Schopenhauer, integrating them into his psychological framework. A key focus is Kant’s metaphor of crystallization in the Critique of Judgment and its connection to Jung’s archetypes, which organize psychic material into coherent symbols. The study also explores Jung’s divergence from Freud, emphasizing Jung’s teleological approach to psychology. By reconstructing Jung’s engagement with Kant, this paper argues that Jung’s method creatively extends Kantian rationality by integrating meaning-making as an essential cognitive function.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Jungian Analytical Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jung’s Kant: Between Philosophical Inspiration and Creative Misinterpretation

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Jungian Analytical Psychology
article

Jung’s Kant: Between Philosophical Inspiration and Creative Misinterpretation

article en

Abstract

This paper examines the influence of Immanuel Kant’s epistemology and aesthetics on Carl Gustav Jung’s depth psychology, particularly with regard to the concept of archetypes. Kant’s division between the noumenal and phenomenal realms mirrors Jung’s view of the unconscious as a structuring force in human cognition. Jung adopted Kantian ideas through his own primary reading, but also from sources such as Carl du Prel and Arthur Schopenhauer, integrating them into his psychological framework. A key focus is Kant’s metaphor of crystallization in the Critique of Judgment and its connection to Jung’s archetypes, which organize psychic material into coherent symbols. The study also explores Jung’s divergence from Freud, emphasizing Jung’s teleological approach to psychology. By reconstructing Jung’s engagement with Kant, this paper argues that Jung’s method creatively extends Kantian rationality by integrating meaning-making as an essential cognitive function.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
University of Vienna (AT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Jungian Analytical Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.