Freedom and Families: Reconstruction Republicans and the Question of Women's Reproductive Autonomy

This Essay proceeds in three Parts. In the first, I illuminate how congressional Republicans discussed women, gender, and families in the context of policymaking associated with abolishing slavery. Many Republicans worried that enslaved people’s family relationships had been damaged by the imposition of slavery and sought to impose on freedpeople what they saw as normative family values, including by encouraging heterosexual marriage and by insisting on patriarchal gender roles within families. Second, I show that Republicans were at pains to demonstrate that when they talked about equality, they meant race but not gender. Finally, I reflect on the limits of relying on elite discourse for understanding the past and discuss synergies between the work of some constitutional law scholars and that of historians working to deepen our collective understanding of the history of women, gender, and families in the nineteenth-century United States. This abstract has been taken from the author's introduction.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Freedom and Families: Reconstruction Republicans and the Question of Women's Reproductive Autonomy

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
article

Freedom and Families: Reconstruction Republicans and the Question of Women's Reproductive Autonomy

article en

Abstract

This Essay proceeds in three Parts. In the first, I illuminate how congressional Republicans discussed women, gender, and families in the context of policymaking associated with abolishing slavery. Many Republicans worried that enslaved people’s family relationships had been damaged by the imposition of slavery and sought to impose on freedpeople what they saw as normative family values, including by encouraging heterosexual marriage and by insisting on patriarchal gender roles within families. Second, I show that Republicans were at pains to demonstrate that when they talked about equality, they meant race but not gender. Finally, I reflect on the limits of relying on elite discourse for understanding the past and discuss synergies between the work of some constitutional law scholars and that of historians working to deepen our collective understanding of the history of women, gender, and families in the nineteenth-century United States. This abstract has been taken from the author's introduction.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.