GenAI and Decision Making – An Eye-Tracking Study

With the rise of Generative AI (GenAI) in e-commerce, more and more platforms are integrating GenAI tools such as GenAI review summarization and chatbots to assist consumers in their decision making. Consumers experience less information overload and greater decision satisfaction when exposed to a manageable amount of user reviews (Hu et al., 2019). This suggests that GenAI review summarization can reduce the cognitive burden on a consumer. Research is now beginning to uncover how GenAI review summaries and their valence influence decision making (Wang et al., 2025; Todd et al., 2024). For example, Wang et al. (2025) found that AI-generated review summarization positively impacts product sales and that its effectiveness is moderated by the number of reviews (in a U-shaped pattern), average rating, and rating dispersion. These findings suggest that GenAI tools actively influence the purchasing decisions of a consumer under varying conditions. However, they examine such tools in isolation. The combined effect of more than one GenAI-powered tool in decision making, as in the real world, is yet to be explored. Our study investigates how GenAI review summaries and chatbot conversations collectively influence a consumer’s decision making. While GenAI review summaries give consumers a quick overview of what others are saying about a product or service, chatbots offer conversational responses tailored to a consumer’s specific questions. Drawing on Media Richness Theory, we theorize that chatbots represent a richer medium than static GenAI review summaries. We further study the definite valence of GenAI review summaries as a moderator of their influence on purchase intention. This study will use eye-tracking technology as a neurophysiological tool to measure a consumer’s cognitive engagement with each GenAI medium in an experimental setup. Participants will complete a shopping task on a simulated e-commerce website where each GenAI medium acts as a treatment. We will collect metrics based on predefined Areas of Interest (AOIs), such as fixation duration, fixation count, time to first fixation, etc. These metrics will be used to empirically analyze how consumers cognitively process each type of GenAI medium and their collective impact on decision making. Our findings will contribute to the growing GenAI and NeuroIS literature.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-16
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GenAI and Decision Making – An Eye-Tracking Study

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
AI in Service Interactions
article

GenAI and Decision Making – An Eye-Tracking Study

article en

Abstract

With the rise of Generative AI (GenAI) in e-commerce, more and more platforms are integrating GenAI tools such as GenAI review summarization and chatbots to assist consumers in their decision making. Consumers experience less information overload and greater decision satisfaction when exposed to a manageable amount of user reviews (Hu et al., 2019). This suggests that GenAI review summarization can reduce the cognitive burden on a consumer. Research is now beginning to uncover how GenAI review summaries and their valence influence decision making (Wang et al., 2025; Todd et al., 2024). For example, Wang et al. (2025) found that AI-generated review summarization positively impacts product sales and that its effectiveness is moderated by the number of reviews (in a U-shaped pattern), average rating, and rating dispersion. These findings suggest that GenAI tools actively influence the purchasing decisions of a consumer under varying conditions. However, they examine such tools in isolation. The combined effect of more than one GenAI-powered tool in decision making, as in the real world, is yet to be explored. Our study investigates how GenAI review summaries and chatbot conversations collectively influence a consumer’s decision making. While GenAI review summaries give consumers a quick overview of what others are saying about a product or service, chatbots offer conversational responses tailored to a consumer’s specific questions. Drawing on Media Richness Theory, we theorize that chatbots represent a richer medium than static GenAI review summaries. We further study the definite valence of GenAI review summaries as a moderator of their influence on purchase intention. This study will use eye-tracking technology as a neurophysiological tool to measure a consumer’s cognitive engagement with each GenAI medium in an experimental setup. Participants will complete a shopping task on a simulated e-commerce website where each GenAI medium acts as a treatment. We will collect metrics based on predefined Areas of Interest (AOIs), such as fixation duration, fixation count, time to first fixation, etc. These metrics will be used to empirically analyze how consumers cognitively process each type of GenAI medium and their collective impact on decision making. Our findings will contribute to the growing GenAI and NeuroIS literature.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.