Forecasting carbon emissions from electricity generation: classical vs functional methods

This study investigates short-term forecasting of carbon emissions from electricity generation in the northern and southern Italian electricity markets. The analysis considers linear parametric models, such as seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA); functional parametric models, including seasonal functional autoregressive (S)FAR and functional autoregressive with exogenous input (SFARX); and nonparametric (possibly nonlinear) models, such as generalised additive models (GAM) and the TBATS model. In addition, forecast combination techniques are explored, incorporating predictions from multiple models through simple averaging, the Bates and Granger (1969) method, and a selection-based approach. Forecast performance is evaluated using hourly root mean squared error (RMSE) over a one-year test period. The results indicate that the functional models consistently achieve the lowest relative RMSE during the early morning hours, whereas the GAM models outperform all others throughout the day, afternoon, and evening. These findings highlight the benefits of forecast combinations, particularly the selection-based approach, which effectively integrates functional and GAM models to improve predictive performance.

Publication Details

Journal
Research Padua Archive (University of Padua)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forecasting carbon emissions from electricity generation: classical vs functional methods

Research Padua Archive (University of Padua)
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
article

Forecasting carbon emissions from electricity generation: classical vs functional methods

article en

Abstract

This study investigates short-term forecasting of carbon emissions from electricity generation in the northern and southern Italian electricity markets. The analysis considers linear parametric models, such as seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA); functional parametric models, including seasonal functional autoregressive (S)FAR and functional autoregressive with exogenous input (SFARX); and nonparametric (possibly nonlinear) models, such as generalised additive models (GAM) and the TBATS model. In addition, forecast combination techniques are explored, incorporating predictions from multiple models through simple averaging, the Bates and Granger (1969) method, and a selection-based approach. Forecast performance is evaluated using hourly root mean squared error (RMSE) over a one-year test period. The results indicate that the functional models consistently achieve the lowest relative RMSE during the early morning hours, whereas the GAM models outperform all others throughout the day, afternoon, and evening. These findings highlight the benefits of forecast combinations, particularly the selection-based approach, which effectively integrates functional and GAM models to improve predictive performance.

Research Padua Archive (University of Padua)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Forecasting carbon emissions from electricity generation: classical vs functional methods · Research Padua Archive (University of Padua) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS