Freedom, Authority, and the Organization of Work

Most workers today labor under the authority of an employer. In this chapter, I examine three philosophical views on the reasons that may justify this hierarchy of authority and the conditions that may instantiate or serve those reasons. On the first view, workplace hierarchy is justified insofar as it promotes efficient production—whether because efficiency yields a higher economic output that serves independent aims, including a fiduciary duty to create wealth, or because it transforms subjection to the natural person occupying the office of boss into subjection to the office itself, making the resulting hierarchy unobjectionable. The second view focuses on whether workers, in exercising their freedom of occupation, voluntarily consent to working within a firm’s hierarchy. On the third view, workplace hierarchy is tolerable only if it is constrained to uphold the relational equality of employers and employees, whose authority relation some variants compare to the authority relation of state to subject, and to prevent workers from being dominated by their employers.

Publication Details

Journal
PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Freedom, Authority, and the Organization of Work

PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

Freedom, Authority, and the Organization of Work

article en

Abstract

Most workers today labor under the authority of an employer. In this chapter, I examine three philosophical views on the reasons that may justify this hierarchy of authority and the conditions that may instantiate or serve those reasons. On the first view, workplace hierarchy is justified insofar as it promotes efficient production—whether because efficiency yields a higher economic output that serves independent aims, including a fiduciary duty to create wealth, or because it transforms subjection to the natural person occupying the office of boss into subjection to the office itself, making the resulting hierarchy unobjectionable. The second view focuses on whether workers, in exercising their freedom of occupation, voluntarily consent to working within a firm’s hierarchy. On the third view, workplace hierarchy is tolerable only if it is constrained to uphold the relational equality of employers and employees, whose authority relation some variants compare to the authority relation of state to subject, and to prevent workers from being dominated by their employers.

PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Freedom, Authority, and the Organization of Work · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS