Evaluation of Sensitivity and Specificity of Acuity 360 Telemedicine Vision Screening System

Nicholas R Binder,1 Jeffrey M Bloom,1 Mineh Balushian Haftevani,1 Stephen Duncan,1 Nathan Christopher Lowry,2 Tom S Chang1 1Vitreoretinal Surgery, Acuity Eye Group, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2Intelligent DX, Los Angeles, CA, USACorrespondence: Jeffrey M Bloom, Acuity Eye Group, 288 N Santa Anita Ave, Suite 403, Arcadia, CA, 91006, USA, Email [email protected]: Our aim is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of Acuity 360 telemedicine system, as compared to in-person clinic examination, in identifying clinically significant eye disease. Acuity 360 is a combination of commercially available ocular imaging devices used together to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the structures and diseases of the eye.Methods: Observational cross-sectional study of consecutively examined patients where 19 remote examiners analyzed 80 patients using Acuity 360 images. The examiners’ diagnoses were compared to the diagnosis obtained from in-person clinic examination of all the patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), false-negative rate, and inter-rater agreement were calculated.Results: Compared to in-person clinic examination, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and false-negative rate for the optical coherence tomography (OCT) of optic nerve were 95.8%, 98.5%, 86.8%, 99.6%, 0.39% and for the combined retina examination (OCT of the macula and widefield fundus photography) were 93.4%, 88.5%, 80.2%, 96.4%, 2.19%, respectively. The median inter-rater agreement the OCT of optic nerve and the combined retina examination were each 95%.Conclusion: The Acuity 360 telemedicine system has a low false-negative rate and is highly sensitive and specific when compared to an in-person clinic examination. It can determine the necessity for specialist referral and triage the patients that require urgent treatment. High inter-rater agreement shows that it is effective with minimal variability in analyzing the Acuity 360 images by remote examiners.Keywords: tele-ophthalmology, telemedicine, sensitivity, specificity, optical coherence tomography

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Sensitivity and Specificity of Acuity 360 Telemedicine Vision Screening System

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

Evaluation of Sensitivity and Specificity of Acuity 360 Telemedicine Vision Screening System

article en

Abstract

Nicholas R Binder,1 Jeffrey M Bloom,1 Mineh Balushian Haftevani,1 Stephen Duncan,1 Nathan Christopher Lowry,2 Tom S Chang1 1Vitreoretinal Surgery, Acuity Eye Group, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2Intelligent DX, Los Angeles, CA, USACorrespondence: Jeffrey M Bloom, Acuity Eye Group, 288 N Santa Anita Ave, Suite 403, Arcadia, CA, 91006, USA, Email [email protected]: Our aim is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of Acuity 360 telemedicine system, as compared to in-person clinic examination, in identifying clinically significant eye disease. Acuity 360 is a combination of commercially available ocular imaging devices used together to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the structures and diseases of the eye.Methods: Observational cross-sectional study of consecutively examined patients where 19 remote examiners analyzed 80 patients using Acuity 360 images. The examiners’ diagnoses were compared to the diagnosis obtained from in-person clinic examination of all the patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), false-negative rate, and inter-rater agreement were calculated.Results: Compared to in-person clinic examination, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and false-negative rate for the optical coherence tomography (OCT) of optic nerve were 95.8%, 98.5%, 86.8%, 99.6%, 0.39% and for the combined retina examination (OCT of the macula and widefield fundus photography) were 93.4%, 88.5%, 80.2%, 96.4%, 2.19%, respectively. The median inter-rater agreement the OCT of optic nerve and the combined retina examination were each 95%.Conclusion: The Acuity 360 telemedicine system has a low false-negative rate and is highly sensitive and specific when compared to an in-person clinic examination. It can determine the necessity for specialist referral and triage the patients that require urgent treatment. High inter-rater agreement shows that it is effective with minimal variability in analyzing the Acuity 360 images by remote examiners.Keywords: tele-ophthalmology, telemedicine, sensitivity, specificity, optical coherence tomography

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Sensitivity and Specificity of Acuity 360 Telemedicine Vision Screening System · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS