Evaluation of Olaparib Tablet Safety and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects

Ruihua Dong,1,* Jingcheng Chen,1,* Nini Guo,2 Yingying Yang,2 Jingxuan Wu,1 Xiaoru Wang,2 Yuqin Song,1 Xueyuan Zhang2 1Phase I Clinical Trial Laboratory, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Clinical Department, CSPC Zhongqi Pharmaceutical Technology (SJZ) Co., LTD., Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xueyuan Zhang, Clinical Department, CSPC Zhongqi Pharmaceutical Technology (SJZ) Co., LTD., Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050035, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-311-69085585, Email [email protected]: To evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of olaparib tablet test formulation (T) and reference formulation (R) in healthy Chinese male subjects.Subjects and Methods: This was a single-dose, randomized-sequence, two-way crossover study including three parts: part A: a safety exploration design in lower dose (n = 14, 100 mg), part B: a pivotal comparative pharmacokinetic (PK) trial under fast condition (n = 44, 150 mg) and part C: a pivotal comparative PK trial under food condition (n = 44, 150 mg). Blood samples were collected for 72 hours and the PK parameters of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were used to evaluate PK differences.Results: PK analysis of the two olaparib formulations showed that the Geometric Least Squares Mean (GLSM) ratio 90% confidence intervals for pivotal fasting Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 94.82– 108.97%, 92.94– 104.28%, and 92.81– 103.85%, respectively, and pivotal fed Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 82.78– 100.97%, 91.59– 104.67%, and 92.17– 104.76%, respectively. The 90% confidence interval of the two preparations, Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞, all fall within the equivalent range of 80– 125%. Both olaparib tablet formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events (SAE) or adverse events (AE) causing withdrawal occurred.Conclusion: Two types of olaparib tablets were bioequivalent under both fasting and fed condition, and were generally well tolerated in healthy Chinese male subjects.Keywords: olaparib, safety, pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, healthy Chinese male subjects

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Olaparib Tablet Safety and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
article

Evaluation of Olaparib Tablet Safety and Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects

article en

Abstract

Ruihua Dong,1,* Jingcheng Chen,1,* Nini Guo,2 Yingying Yang,2 Jingxuan Wu,1 Xiaoru Wang,2 Yuqin Song,1 Xueyuan Zhang2 1Phase I Clinical Trial Laboratory, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Clinical Department, CSPC Zhongqi Pharmaceutical Technology (SJZ) Co., LTD., Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xueyuan Zhang, Clinical Department, CSPC Zhongqi Pharmaceutical Technology (SJZ) Co., LTD., Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050035, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-311-69085585, Email [email protected]: To evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of olaparib tablet test formulation (T) and reference formulation (R) in healthy Chinese male subjects.Subjects and Methods: This was a single-dose, randomized-sequence, two-way crossover study including three parts: part A: a safety exploration design in lower dose (n = 14, 100 mg), part B: a pivotal comparative pharmacokinetic (PK) trial under fast condition (n = 44, 150 mg) and part C: a pivotal comparative PK trial under food condition (n = 44, 150 mg). Blood samples were collected for 72 hours and the PK parameters of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were used to evaluate PK differences.Results: PK analysis of the two olaparib formulations showed that the Geometric Least Squares Mean (GLSM) ratio 90% confidence intervals for pivotal fasting Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 94.82– 108.97%, 92.94– 104.28%, and 92.81– 103.85%, respectively, and pivotal fed Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 82.78– 100.97%, 91.59– 104.67%, and 92.17– 104.76%, respectively. The 90% confidence interval of the two preparations, Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞, all fall within the equivalent range of 80– 125%. Both olaparib tablet formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events (SAE) or adverse events (AE) causing withdrawal occurred.Conclusion: Two types of olaparib tablets were bioequivalent under both fasting and fed condition, and were generally well tolerated in healthy Chinese male subjects.Keywords: olaparib, safety, pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, healthy Chinese male subjects

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.