Evaluating Corruption Defenses for Model Robustness

Within the last few years, deep learning models have seen increased usage in various computer vision domains and have attained high accuracy rates for several visual identification tasks. However, when faced with real data containing visible anomalies, their accuracy can be reduced significantly. In addition, adversarial examples, inputs with deliberate changes that induce misclassification, have further hindered their performance. The training methods used to minimize the effects of adversarial examples have also been found to negatively impact a model's robustness on clean data as well as common noise and distortions, which may be an undesired trade-off. Adversarial robustness is a model's ability to resist intentional deceptive inputs, while corruption robustness is its resilience to everyday noise and distortions. In our work, we adopt a technique that improves the neural network's ability to generalize by training on augmented images of the dataset and evaluate its efficacy in the face of adversarial examples with several empirical metrics, comparing its performance with traditional adversarial training techniques.

Publication Details

Journal
Furman University Scholar Exchange (Furman University)
Published
2025-04-05
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Corruption Defenses for Model Robustness

Furman University Scholar Exchange (Furman University)
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

Evaluating Corruption Defenses for Model Robustness

article en

Abstract

Within the last few years, deep learning models have seen increased usage in various computer vision domains and have attained high accuracy rates for several visual identification tasks. However, when faced with real data containing visible anomalies, their accuracy can be reduced significantly. In addition, adversarial examples, inputs with deliberate changes that induce misclassification, have further hindered their performance. The training methods used to minimize the effects of adversarial examples have also been found to negatively impact a model's robustness on clean data as well as common noise and distortions, which may be an undesired trade-off. Adversarial robustness is a model's ability to resist intentional deceptive inputs, while corruption robustness is its resilience to everyday noise and distortions. In our work, we adopt a technique that improves the neural network's ability to generalize by training on augmented images of the dataset and evaluate its efficacy in the face of adversarial examples with several empirical metrics, comparing its performance with traditional adversarial training techniques.

Furman University Scholar Exchange (Furman University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.