The Difference(s) Between Autistic Individuals and Neurotypical Individuals when Learning to Identify Pitch

This study aimed to compare and determine possible differences between autistic and neurotypical individuals in learning to identify pitch. This study investigates whether autistic individuals are more accurate at pitch-matching than neurotypical individuals. This study employs a quantitative approach and a variation of the pitch-matching test. The population for this study consisted of males and females from West Virginia, with 20 autistic and neurotypical participants aged 18 years and older. The study included 50% of participants with autism and 50% of neurotypical participants. In each group, there were an even number of males and females, neurotypical and neuroatypical, and a mix of ages within the age range. This study was conducted primarily in a private classroom in Barboursville, West Virginia, and partly via FaceTime calls. This relatively small room contained only a keyboard and two chairs to avoid distractions. Many findings can be derived from this study. This study will potentially improve music education for autistic students and impact their communities. Identifying the number of autistic individuals with perfect or exceptional relative pitches could greatly affect their music learning. Making these connections between pitch-matching and neuroatypical students could also benefit music educators when designing curricula. The results of the study show that the neurotypical participants scored higher on accurate pitch matching than the neuroatypical participants.

Publication Details

Journal
Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)
Published
2024-08-29
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Difference(s) Between Autistic Individuals and Neurotypical Individuals when Learning to Identify Pitch

Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)
Neuroscience and Music Perception
article

The Difference(s) Between Autistic Individuals and Neurotypical Individuals when Learning to Identify Pitch

article en

Abstract

This study aimed to compare and determine possible differences between autistic and neurotypical individuals in learning to identify pitch. This study investigates whether autistic individuals are more accurate at pitch-matching than neurotypical individuals. This study employs a quantitative approach and a variation of the pitch-matching test. The population for this study consisted of males and females from West Virginia, with 20 autistic and neurotypical participants aged 18 years and older. The study included 50% of participants with autism and 50% of neurotypical participants. In each group, there were an even number of males and females, neurotypical and neuroatypical, and a mix of ages within the age range. This study was conducted primarily in a private classroom in Barboursville, West Virginia, and partly via FaceTime calls. This relatively small room contained only a keyboard and two chairs to avoid distractions. Many findings can be derived from this study. This study will potentially improve music education for autistic students and impact their communities. Identifying the number of autistic individuals with perfect or exceptional relative pitches could greatly affect their music learning. Making these connections between pitch-matching and neuroatypical students could also benefit music educators when designing curricula. The results of the study show that the neurotypical participants scored higher on accurate pitch matching than the neuroatypical participants.

Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.