DESIGN AFFORDANCES OF GENERATIVE AI IN ROUTINES: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY

This study investigates how organizations develop an understanding of the designed affordances of generative AI to intentionally redesign their routines. Generative AI introduces new action potentials that developers embed into device-enabled routines to enhance organizational capabilities. Employing a mixed-method approach, including focus groups, participant observation, document studies, and interviews, we analyze four case studies across diverse industries. The findings reveal a set of designed affordances as well as four development paths through which developers build their understanding of generative AI’s capabilities. These paths shape how affordances are framed and embedded in routine design. This study contributes to affordance theory by highlighting the design phase as a site of affordance construction, and by introducing development paths as an analytical tool for understanding how organizations make sense of new technological potentials. Future research should explore how these designed affordances are enacted and adapted through routine execution and diffusion.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-06-18
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DESIGN AFFORDANCES OF GENERATIVE AI IN ROUTINES: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

DESIGN AFFORDANCES OF GENERATIVE AI IN ROUTINES: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY

article en

Abstract

This study investigates how organizations develop an understanding of the designed affordances of generative AI to intentionally redesign their routines. Generative AI introduces new action potentials that developers embed into device-enabled routines to enhance organizational capabilities. Employing a mixed-method approach, including focus groups, participant observation, document studies, and interviews, we analyze four case studies across diverse industries. The findings reveal a set of designed affordances as well as four development paths through which developers build their understanding of generative AI’s capabilities. These paths shape how affordances are framed and embedded in routine design. This study contributes to affordance theory by highlighting the design phase as a site of affordance construction, and by introducing development paths as an analytical tool for understanding how organizations make sense of new technological potentials. Future research should explore how these designed affordances are enacted and adapted through routine execution and diffusion.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Västra Götalandsregionen, Tillväxtverket
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.