3D vs. 2D – Exploring Pedagogical Conversational Agents for AI-supported Brainstorming

Universities are increasingly offering courses on the development of new and innovative business models. Despite the relevance of digital teaching, they so far rarely use digital collaboration and ideation tools. Pedagogical conversation agents (PCAs) can moderate collaborative learning tasks and support creative processes. Integrating PCAs into virtual worlds is an innovative approach to combine both technologies' advantages regarding learning and collaboration support. This mixed methods study examines the perception of an AI-moderated group brainstorming in a 3D virtual world compared to AI-moderated brainstorming in a 2D chat using a between-subjects experiment with 70 learners. Quantitative results from the learners‘ perception reveal mostly higher ratings of the 2D chat. Qualitative results however show that learners highlighted the 3D world's potential regarding the social relatedness within the group. This paper contributes new knowledge on PCAs in entrepreneurship education, the design of virtual worlds, as well as the effects of AI-supported brainstorming.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-15
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3D vs. 2D – Exploring Pedagogical Conversational Agents for AI-supported Brainstorming

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
AI in Service Interactions
article

3D vs. 2D – Exploring Pedagogical Conversational Agents for AI-supported Brainstorming

article en

Abstract

Universities are increasingly offering courses on the development of new and innovative business models. Despite the relevance of digital teaching, they so far rarely use digital collaboration and ideation tools. Pedagogical conversation agents (PCAs) can moderate collaborative learning tasks and support creative processes. Integrating PCAs into virtual worlds is an innovative approach to combine both technologies' advantages regarding learning and collaboration support. This mixed methods study examines the perception of an AI-moderated group brainstorming in a 3D virtual world compared to AI-moderated brainstorming in a 2D chat using a between-subjects experiment with 70 learners. Quantitative results from the learners‘ perception reveal mostly higher ratings of the 2D chat. Qualitative results however show that learners highlighted the 3D world's potential regarding the social relatedness within the group. This paper contributes new knowledge on PCAs in entrepreneurship education, the design of virtual worlds, as well as the effects of AI-supported brainstorming.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

3D vs. 2D – Exploring Pedagogical Conversational Agents for AI-supported Brainstorming · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS