The Decline of Civil Discourse on Facebook: A Qualitative Content Analysis of the Comment Sections of News Organizations' Facebook Pages

This study explores the role of Facebook’s comment sections in the decline of civil discourse, examining how the platform’s design influences user behaviors and contributes to increased incivility. Through a qualitative content analysis of 3,030 comments from 12 national and regional news organizations’ posts on both Facebook and their website, the research identifies key structural elements such as engagement-drive algorithms and broader reaction options that amplify uncivil behavior. The study also introduces three prevalent persona types in online discourse—the passionate partisan, the agitator, and the cynical joker. Each of these contributes to the dynamics of incivility in different ways. Grounded in Gidden’s theory of structuration, the findings suggest that Facebook’s structural design not only facilitates incivility but also perpetuates it through a feedback loop where hostile interactions are rewarded with visibility. The research highlights the role of social identity theory in shaping user interactions, as individuals are motivated to defend their in-group and discredit opposing viewpoints, amplifying polarization. This study concludes that platform design plays a significant role in promoting or mitigating incivility and offers recommendations for fostering more constructive discourse into the future.

Publication Details

Journal
Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)
Published
2025-04-18
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Decline of Civil Discourse on Facebook: A Qualitative Content Analysis of the Comment Sections of News Organizations' Facebook Pages

Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)
Social Media and Politics
article

The Decline of Civil Discourse on Facebook: A Qualitative Content Analysis of the Comment Sections of News Organizations' Facebook Pages

article en

Abstract

This study explores the role of Facebook’s comment sections in the decline of civil discourse, examining how the platform’s design influences user behaviors and contributes to increased incivility. Through a qualitative content analysis of 3,030 comments from 12 national and regional news organizations’ posts on both Facebook and their website, the research identifies key structural elements such as engagement-drive algorithms and broader reaction options that amplify uncivil behavior. The study also introduces three prevalent persona types in online discourse—the passionate partisan, the agitator, and the cynical joker. Each of these contributes to the dynamics of incivility in different ways. Grounded in Gidden’s theory of structuration, the findings suggest that Facebook’s structural design not only facilitates incivility but also perpetuates it through a feedback loop where hostile interactions are rewarded with visibility. The research highlights the role of social identity theory in shaping user interactions, as individuals are motivated to defend their in-group and discredit opposing viewpoints, amplifying polarization. This study concludes that platform design plays a significant role in promoting or mitigating incivility and offers recommendations for fostering more constructive discourse into the future.

Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.