Comparison Between NoSQL and SQL Database Solutions for DICOM Data

Internal imaging is a crucial part of healthcare to diagnose different conditions. DICOM has become the international standard for storing and transmitting medical images obtained by different internal imaging devices. These images are stored in DICOM files that cannot be opened and read as a regular text file. The files require special software to be viewed. Finding a specific file for a patient can therefore become a difficult task. A database management system can be used to easier locate the desired file. Traditionally, this is done with the use of a relational database, but there has been an increase in the use of NoSQL models in recent years. The benefit of using a document-based NoSQL model is its flexible schema and avoidance of join operations. Related information can be stored together in nested documents. This thesis compare the relational MySQL with the document-based MongoDB in terms of retrieval time for different queries to determine which model is better suited for storing DICOM data. The result of the thesis shows that the decision between the two models for storing DICOM data is largely dependent on the queries performed on the database. Although MySQL performed better for some queries, MongoDB was faster at executing simple queries that do not need aggregation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Wireless Sensor Networks for Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Between NoSQL and SQL Database Solutions for DICOM Data

DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University)
Wireless Sensor Networks for Data Analysis
article

Comparison Between NoSQL and SQL Database Solutions for DICOM Data

article en

Abstract

Internal imaging is a crucial part of healthcare to diagnose different conditions. DICOM has become the international standard for storing and transmitting medical images obtained by different internal imaging devices. These images are stored in DICOM files that cannot be opened and read as a regular text file. The files require special software to be viewed. Finding a specific file for a patient can therefore become a difficult task. A database management system can be used to easier locate the desired file. Traditionally, this is done with the use of a relational database, but there has been an increase in the use of NoSQL models in recent years. The benefit of using a document-based NoSQL model is its flexible schema and avoidance of join operations. Related information can be stored together in nested documents. This thesis compare the relational MySQL with the document-based MongoDB in terms of retrieval time for different queries to determine which model is better suited for storing DICOM data. The result of the thesis shows that the decision between the two models for storing DICOM data is largely dependent on the queries performed on the database. Although MySQL performed better for some queries, MongoDB was faster at executing simple queries that do not need aggregation.

DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University)
Computing Center (RU)
National Cancer Institute, Moonshot Research and Development Program, Cancer Moonshot
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Wireless Sensor Networks for Data Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison Between NoSQL and SQL Database Solutions for DICOM Data · DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS