CoEmo: Modeling Cognitive Processes in Facial Expression Recognition through Action Units and Gender Perspectives

Facial expression recognition lies at the intersection of computer science and cognitive psychology, yet the cognitive structure underlying facial action unit (AU) and emotion processing remains unclear. Are AUs and emotions processed in parallel or sequentially? Does gender influence this process? We constructed a 3D face dataset annotated with AU amplitudes and emotion labels. To model cognitive processing hypotheses, we implemented parallel and sequential architectures via multi-task learning and pipelined CNNs. Gender-specific models were compared using representational similarity analysis (RSA) with theoretical emotion spaces. The parallel model (F1 = 42.9%) outperformed the sequential one (F1 = 17.1%), supporting the parallel processing hypothesis. RSA revealed that females' emotion recognition aligned with social distance between emotions, while males' performance was selectively influenced by anger representations. These findings suggest sex-specific representational structures in emotion processing and support parallelism as a plausible cognitive mechanism in facial expression recognition.

Publication Details

Journal
eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Emotion and Mood Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CoEmo: Modeling Cognitive Processes in Facial Expression Recognition through Action Units and Gender Perspectives

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Emotion and Mood Recognition
article

CoEmo: Modeling Cognitive Processes in Facial Expression Recognition through Action Units and Gender Perspectives

article en

Abstract

Facial expression recognition lies at the intersection of computer science and cognitive psychology, yet the cognitive structure underlying facial action unit (AU) and emotion processing remains unclear. Are AUs and emotions processed in parallel or sequentially? Does gender influence this process? We constructed a 3D face dataset annotated with AU amplitudes and emotion labels. To model cognitive processing hypotheses, we implemented parallel and sequential architectures via multi-task learning and pipelined CNNs. Gender-specific models were compared using representational similarity analysis (RSA) with theoretical emotion spaces. The parallel model (F1 = 42.9%) outperformed the sequential one (F1 = 17.1%), supporting the parallel processing hypothesis. RSA revealed that females' emotion recognition aligned with social distance between emotions, while males' performance was selectively influenced by anger representations. These findings suggest sex-specific representational structures in emotion processing and support parallelism as a plausible cognitive mechanism in facial expression recognition.

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Emotion and Mood Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CoEmo: Modeling Cognitive Processes in Facial Expression Recognition through Action Units and Gender Perspectives · eScholarship (California Digital Library) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS