A Comparison of Muscular Strength and Power Development In Unilateral and Bilateral Lower Body Exercises

The purpose of this study was to compare muscle strength and power development following training programs that involved unilateral and bilateral lower-body exercises. A randomized between-groups research design was used in which results from a pretest and posttest were compared across the unilateral and bilateral groups. Sled machine one repetition maximum (1-RM) testing was used as a measure of strength, and countermovement vertical jump (CMVJ) testing was used as a measure of absolute power. Total body bioelectrical impedance analysis testing was used to predict lean body mass in both the left and right legs. Six college-aged female students who were not physically active completed 12 exercise sessions over a four-week training period involving a variation of squats, sled machine pushes, a deadlift, and box step-ups utilizing one or both legs. The specific variation of exercises for each participant was determined by randomized placement into one of the two groups. Sets, repetitions, and loads were determined using percentages of individual 1-RM values that were associated with ACSM recommendations for strength and power development. There were no significant differences in the change in 1-RM values (p=0.18) between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the change in CMVJ values (p=0.15) between the two groups. This study demonstrates a lack of significant differences in muscular strength and power development using unilateral versus bilateral lower body exercises and suggests that other factors of exercise prescription, such as exercise intensity and frequency, may play a larger role in muscular adaptation than the use of one or both limbs.

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Showcase Research, Scholarship, & Creative Works (University of Lynchburg)
Published
2025-04-16
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Muscular Strength and Power Development In Unilateral and Bilateral Lower Body Exercises

Digital Showcase Research, Scholarship, & Creative Works (University of Lynchburg)
Sports Performance and Training
article

A Comparison of Muscular Strength and Power Development In Unilateral and Bilateral Lower Body Exercises

article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare muscle strength and power development following training programs that involved unilateral and bilateral lower-body exercises. A randomized between-groups research design was used in which results from a pretest and posttest were compared across the unilateral and bilateral groups. Sled machine one repetition maximum (1-RM) testing was used as a measure of strength, and countermovement vertical jump (CMVJ) testing was used as a measure of absolute power. Total body bioelectrical impedance analysis testing was used to predict lean body mass in both the left and right legs. Six college-aged female students who were not physically active completed 12 exercise sessions over a four-week training period involving a variation of squats, sled machine pushes, a deadlift, and box step-ups utilizing one or both legs. The specific variation of exercises for each participant was determined by randomized placement into one of the two groups. Sets, repetitions, and loads were determined using percentages of individual 1-RM values that were associated with ACSM recommendations for strength and power development. There were no significant differences in the change in 1-RM values (p=0.18) between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the change in CMVJ values (p=0.15) between the two groups. This study demonstrates a lack of significant differences in muscular strength and power development using unilateral versus bilateral lower body exercises and suggests that other factors of exercise prescription, such as exercise intensity and frequency, may play a larger role in muscular adaptation than the use of one or both limbs.

Digital Showcase Research, Scholarship, & Creative Works (University of Lynchburg)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.