Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Colistin Sulphate in Treating Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms and Analysis of Influencing Factors

Ying-Chao Ma,1 Ya-Qing Sun,2 Xia Wu,1 Yong-Jing Wang,1 Xiu-Ling Yang,1 Jian-Jun Gu3 1Department of Pharmacy, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, People’s Republic of China; 2College of Pharmacy, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Cardiac Surgery, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jian-Jun Gu, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 215 of Heping West Road, Xinhua District, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China, Tel +8631166002991, Email [email protected] Xiu-Ling Yang, Department of Pharmacy, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 215 of Heping West Road, Xinhua District, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, People’s Republic of China, Tel +8631166002712, Email [email protected]: To assess the efficacy and safety of colistin sulfate in treating infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) and to analyze potential factors impacting its effectiveness.Methods: In this retrospective study, medical records of CRO-infected patients from June 2020 to June 2023 were analyzed, divided into effective and ineffective treatment groups, and compared for clinical outcomes and adverse reactions. Multifactorial logistic regression and ROC curve analysis were used to identify influencing factors.Results: The study included 226 patients, with 124 in the effective treatment group and 102 in the ineffective group. A total of 293 CRO strains were cultured. The clinical efficacy rate of colistin sulfate was 54.87%, the microbiological efficacy rate 46.46%, and the hospital mortality rate 20.80%, with nephrotoxicity observed in 11.50% of patients. Multifactorial analysis identified APACHE II scores and vasoactive drug use as independent predictors of ineffective treatment, while treatment duration and albumin levels predicted effective treatment. ROC analysis indicated that albumin levels > 34 g/L, APACHE II scores < 13, and treatment duration > 10 days correlated with better clinical efficacy.Conclusion: Colistin sulfate is both safe and effective in clinical settings. Factors such as treatment duration, albumin levels, APACHE II scores, and vasoactive drug use independently affect its clinical efficacy, providing valuable guidance for its informed clinical application.Keywords: colistin sulphate, carbapenem-resistant organism, clinical efficacy, influencing factors, safety evaluation

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-09-01
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Colistin Sulphate in Treating Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms and Analysis of Influencing Factors

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Colistin Sulphate in Treating Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms and Analysis of Influencing Factors

article en

Abstract

Ying-Chao Ma,1 Ya-Qing Sun,2 Xia Wu,1 Yong-Jing Wang,1 Xiu-Ling Yang,1 Jian-Jun Gu3 1Department of Pharmacy, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, People’s Republic of China; 2College of Pharmacy, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Cardiac Surgery, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jian-Jun Gu, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 215 of Heping West Road, Xinhua District, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China, Tel +8631166002991, Email [email protected] Xiu-Ling Yang, Department of Pharmacy, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 215 of Heping West Road, Xinhua District, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, People’s Republic of China, Tel +8631166002712, Email [email protected]: To assess the efficacy and safety of colistin sulfate in treating infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) and to analyze potential factors impacting its effectiveness.Methods: In this retrospective study, medical records of CRO-infected patients from June 2020 to June 2023 were analyzed, divided into effective and ineffective treatment groups, and compared for clinical outcomes and adverse reactions. Multifactorial logistic regression and ROC curve analysis were used to identify influencing factors.Results: The study included 226 patients, with 124 in the effective treatment group and 102 in the ineffective group. A total of 293 CRO strains were cultured. The clinical efficacy rate of colistin sulfate was 54.87%, the microbiological efficacy rate 46.46%, and the hospital mortality rate 20.80%, with nephrotoxicity observed in 11.50% of patients. Multifactorial analysis identified APACHE II scores and vasoactive drug use as independent predictors of ineffective treatment, while treatment duration and albumin levels predicted effective treatment. ROC analysis indicated that albumin levels > 34 g/L, APACHE II scores < 13, and treatment duration > 10 days correlated with better clinical efficacy.Conclusion: Colistin sulfate is both safe and effective in clinical settings. Factors such as treatment duration, albumin levels, APACHE II scores, and vasoactive drug use independently affect its clinical efficacy, providing valuable guidance for its informed clinical application.Keywords: colistin sulphate, carbapenem-resistant organism, clinical efficacy, influencing factors, safety evaluation

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.