Characteristics Contributing to the Risk of Diabulimia in Adults Living in the United States

Project Mentor(s): Nicole Stendell-Hollis, PhD, RDN; Tafere G Belay, PhD; Kelly Pritchett, PhD, RDN, CSSD The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and factors that contribute to the risk of diabulimia by using the validated Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R)1 screening tool in adults living in the U.S., as well as to examine differences in individuals at-risk and not-at-risk for diabulimia. This observational study included a 30-question Qualtrics survey containing the DEPS-R distributed via various social media outlets and flyers on the CWU Ellensburg campus. Participants were required to be 18 years or older, diagnosed with T1DM for more than one year, and living in the U.S to participate. A total of 112 participants, 42 (37.2%) males and 68 (60.7%) females; age: 28.89 + 10.48 years, were included in analysis. Of the sample, 43.8% were at risk for diabulimia based on the DEPS-R score cutoff. A previous eating disorder diagnosis (X2(3,112) = 16.117, p < .001), insulin restriction (X2(1,112) = 31.638, p < .001), and race (X2(1,112) = 13.655, p < .001) were associated with risk. In conclusion, it is essential to screen all patients with T1DM for diabulimia throughout their lifetime, which may necessitate revisions to current protocols regarding the frequency and content of diabetes education. The current study found contradicting literature on the factors contributing to an increased risk of diabulimia, including a higher prevalence in males than expected. Therefore, this warrants the need for future research and revisions to proposed diabulimia diagnostic criteria.

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarWorks (Central Washington University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characteristics Contributing to the Risk of Diabulimia in Adults Living in the United States

ScholarWorks (Central Washington University)
Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
article

Characteristics Contributing to the Risk of Diabulimia in Adults Living in the United States

article en

Abstract

Project Mentor(s): Nicole Stendell-Hollis, PhD, RDN; Tafere G Belay, PhD; Kelly Pritchett, PhD, RDN, CSSD The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and factors that contribute to the risk of diabulimia by using the validated Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R)1 screening tool in adults living in the U.S., as well as to examine differences in individuals at-risk and not-at-risk for diabulimia. This observational study included a 30-question Qualtrics survey containing the DEPS-R distributed via various social media outlets and flyers on the CWU Ellensburg campus. Participants were required to be 18 years or older, diagnosed with T1DM for more than one year, and living in the U.S to participate. A total of 112 participants, 42 (37.2%) males and 68 (60.7%) females; age: 28.89 + 10.48 years, were included in analysis. Of the sample, 43.8% were at risk for diabulimia based on the DEPS-R score cutoff. A previous eating disorder diagnosis (X2(3,112) = 16.117, p < .001), insulin restriction (X2(1,112) = 31.638, p < .001), and race (X2(1,112) = 13.655, p < .001) were associated with risk. In conclusion, it is essential to screen all patients with T1DM for diabulimia throughout their lifetime, which may necessitate revisions to current protocols regarding the frequency and content of diabetes education. The current study found contradicting literature on the factors contributing to an increased risk of diabulimia, including a higher prevalence in males than expected. Therefore, this warrants the need for future research and revisions to proposed diabulimia diagnostic criteria.

ScholarWorks (Central Washington University)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.