Can neutral monism solve the hard problem of consciousness?

This thesis investigates whether neutral monism can solve the hard problem of consciousness. This is the problem of why there is any experience. After a brief introduction and discussion of the hard problem, neutral monism is presented as a solution. Two forms of neutral monism are identified: Russellian and Jamesian. The theories are presented, and central differences are discussed. Thereafter, four arguments are levelled at neutral monism. It is argued that neutral monism fails to be neutral, is susceptible to conceivability arguments, that the notion of intrinsic properties as posited by neutral monism can be questioned, and that the attempt to reduce consciousness will inevitably fail. Objections to these arguments are considered but it is shown that they either fail to address the underlying issues or result in further problems. Therefore, it is concluded that neutral monism fails to solve the hard problem of consciousness.