BABYSITTING ALGORITHMS? EXPLORING MANAGERS’ SENSEMAKING OF ALGORITHMIC MANAGEMENT THROUGH STRATEGIC GAMING

Managers increasingly collaborate with algorithmic management systems that assume managerial functions. In this context, managers try to understand algorithms through algorithm sensemaking. While research has explored algorithm sensemaking of platform workers, managers’ algorithm sensemaking process remains unexplored. In this paper, we address this research gap. To this end, we collect digital trace data from forum discussions about the grand strategy video game Stellaris, where players manage a complex interconnected system while competing with others. We analyze these data by combining inductive machine and human pattern recognition through topic modeling and qualitative analysis. We find that players discern two sources of environmental tensions, share similar algorithm sensemaking with workers, but respond differently to them. Based on these insights, we propose a theoretical model that explains managers’ responses to algorithmic management. We contribute to theory and practice by enhancing our understanding of managerial responses to algorithmic management systems.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-06-18
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BABYSITTING ALGORITHMS? EXPLORING MANAGERS’ SENSEMAKING OF ALGORITHMIC MANAGEMENT THROUGH STRATEGIC GAMING

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

BABYSITTING ALGORITHMS? EXPLORING MANAGERS’ SENSEMAKING OF ALGORITHMIC MANAGEMENT THROUGH STRATEGIC GAMING

article en

Abstract

Managers increasingly collaborate with algorithmic management systems that assume managerial functions. In this context, managers try to understand algorithms through algorithm sensemaking. While research has explored algorithm sensemaking of platform workers, managers’ algorithm sensemaking process remains unexplored. In this paper, we address this research gap. To this end, we collect digital trace data from forum discussions about the grand strategy video game Stellaris, where players manage a complex interconnected system while competing with others. We analyze these data by combining inductive machine and human pattern recognition through topic modeling and qualitative analysis. We find that players discern two sources of environmental tensions, share similar algorithm sensemaking with workers, but respond differently to them. Based on these insights, we propose a theoretical model that explains managers’ responses to algorithmic management. We contribute to theory and practice by enhancing our understanding of managerial responses to algorithmic management systems.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Munich School of Philosophy (DE), LMU Klinikum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

BABYSITTING ALGORITHMS? EXPLORING MANAGERS’ SENSEMAKING OF ALGORITHMIC MANAGEMENT THROUGH STRATEGIC GAMING · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS