Aquila and Predator: The Failure and Momentum of Drone Technologies in the U.S., 1970-2015

This article examines the technological and intellectual histories of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) development in the U.S. from the 1970s until 2015. Borrowing from the field of science and technology studies, the author argues that although early drone development demonstrated a significant degree of heterogeneity (i.e., interpretive flexibility), the spectacular failure in 1987 of one program in particular—the Aquila Remotely Piloted Vehicle—thereafter contributed to a significant restricting of UAS potentialities. Aquila’s demise prompted a Congressional directive in 1988 to consolidate the disparate UAS development efforts within the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) under one joint program, ushering in a means by which a singular exemplar artifact, the Predator, could emerge and stabilize as the prevailing UAS technological frame for the following three decades. This article further suggests the possibility that the restricting of UAS potentialities to Predator-like form had the deterministic effect of scripting U.S. policy in its war in Afghanistan, ultimately reducing the latter to a dubious campaign of strategically ineffectual “targeted killings”. If true, this claim establishes an indirect causal link between an obscure technology failure in the 1970-80s with a national strategic failure in the 2010-20s. By centering the Aquila as the subject of the article, the author intends to unbury an understudied attempt by the DoD to develop a drone type that differed drastically from Predator.

Publication Details

Journal
TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
UAV Applications and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aquila and Predator: The Failure and Momentum of Drone Technologies in the U.S., 1970-2015

TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
UAV Applications and Optimization
article

Aquila and Predator: The Failure and Momentum of Drone Technologies in the U.S., 1970-2015

article en

Abstract

This article examines the technological and intellectual histories of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) development in the U.S. from the 1970s until 2015. Borrowing from the field of science and technology studies, the author argues that although early drone development demonstrated a significant degree of heterogeneity (i.e., interpretive flexibility), the spectacular failure in 1987 of one program in particular—the Aquila Remotely Piloted Vehicle—thereafter contributed to a significant restricting of UAS potentialities. Aquila’s demise prompted a Congressional directive in 1988 to consolidate the disparate UAS development efforts within the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) under one joint program, ushering in a means by which a singular exemplar artifact, the Predator, could emerge and stabilize as the prevailing UAS technological frame for the following three decades. This article further suggests the possibility that the restricting of UAS potentialities to Predator-like form had the deterministic effect of scripting U.S. policy in its war in Afghanistan, ultimately reducing the latter to a dubious campaign of strategically ineffectual “targeted killings”. If true, this claim establishes an indirect causal link between an obscure technology failure in the 1970-80s with a national strategic failure in the 2010-20s. By centering the Aquila as the subject of the article, the author intends to unbury an understudied attempt by the DoD to develop a drone type that differed drastically from Predator.

TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
UAV Applications and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.