After Further Review: Are NCAA Conferences Now Subject to Antitrust Liability?

Following the Alston decision, the landscape of college athletics has undergone significant transformation. Although the Supreme Court in Alston previously determined that individual conferences lacked power over the relevant market, this is no longer true for all conferences. This note explores the potential antitrust liability facing individual NCAA conferences in the post-Alston era. It reviews the NCAA’s historical context, its member institutions, and the variations in membership across Divisions and sports. The analysis then shifts to the current state of college athletics, including NIL policies, conference realignment, and media rights deals. The note further assesses whether certain conferences are susceptible to antitrust claims through a rule-of-reason analysis, which reveals that market realities have shifted since Alston, potentially exposing some conferences to legal challenges. Finally, the note proposes strategies for addressing these issues, focusing on mitigating antitrust risks, preparing for potential investigations.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Sports, Gender, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

After Further Review: Are NCAA Conferences Now Subject to Antitrust Liability?

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Sports, Gender, and Society
article

After Further Review: Are NCAA Conferences Now Subject to Antitrust Liability?

article en

Abstract

Following the Alston decision, the landscape of college athletics has undergone significant transformation. Although the Supreme Court in Alston previously determined that individual conferences lacked power over the relevant market, this is no longer true for all conferences. This note explores the potential antitrust liability facing individual NCAA conferences in the post-Alston era. It reviews the NCAA’s historical context, its member institutions, and the variations in membership across Divisions and sports. The analysis then shifts to the current state of college athletics, including NIL policies, conference realignment, and media rights deals. The note further assesses whether certain conferences are susceptible to antitrust claims through a rule-of-reason analysis, which reveals that market realities have shifted since Alston, potentially exposing some conferences to legal challenges. Finally, the note proposes strategies for addressing these issues, focusing on mitigating antitrust risks, preparing for potential investigations.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Sports, Gender, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.