Ai decision making and criminal law execution: Is ai compliant with safety and inmates’ re-socialization?

The execution of criminal judgements represents a crucial phase in the penal system, where the objectives of punitive justice and offender rehabilitation materialize. In recent years, however, the increasing complexity of prison management and the demand for greater efficiency in public administration have driven interest toward the integration of Artificial Intelligence technologies into the penal execution process. This paper investigates the intersection between AI, criminal law execution, and the rehabilitative aims of punishment. While AI holds potential for optimizing prison operations —through predictive analytics, behavioral monitoring, and improved resource allocatio — its application raises significant legal, ethical, and operational concerns. Core issues include the transparency of algorithms, the risk of discrimination, and the potential erosion of fundamental rights. The question at the heart of this research is whether AI-driven decision-making is compatible with public safety and with the constitutional and humanistic goal of inmate rehabilitation.

Publication Details

Journal
Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ai decision making and criminal law execution: Is ai compliant with safety and inmates’ re-socialization?

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Ai decision making and criminal law execution: Is ai compliant with safety and inmates’ re-socialization?

article en

Abstract

The execution of criminal judgements represents a crucial phase in the penal system, where the objectives of punitive justice and offender rehabilitation materialize. In recent years, however, the increasing complexity of prison management and the demand for greater efficiency in public administration have driven interest toward the integration of Artificial Intelligence technologies into the penal execution process. This paper investigates the intersection between AI, criminal law execution, and the rehabilitative aims of punishment. While AI holds potential for optimizing prison operations —through predictive analytics, behavioral monitoring, and improved resource allocatio — its application raises significant legal, ethical, and operational concerns. Core issues include the transparency of algorithms, the risk of discrimination, and the potential erosion of fundamental rights. The question at the heart of this research is whether AI-driven decision-making is compatible with public safety and with the constitutional and humanistic goal of inmate rehabilitation.

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ai decision making and criminal law execution: Is ai compliant with safety and inmates’ re-socialization? · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS