AI Ethics in Legal Decision-Making Bias, Transparency, And Accountability

Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems used in legal decision-making processes have created significant ethical challenges through their integration, leading to problems with bias and necessitating better transparency and accountability measures. This paper investigates the discriminatory effects of algorithmic bias by analyzing AI technologies that learn from historical legal datasets containing potential institutional biases. The opacity of AI decision-making, referred to as "black-boxed" decisions, creates complex obstacles to achieving both explainable judgments and fair outcomes. The article examines the absent responsibility structure that arises when legal practitioners utilize AI systems, as it complicates the identification of responsible parties for unfair and erroneous decisions. The author advocates for the development of a robust ethical framework to regulate AI applications in judicial systems, presenting real-world examples and analyzing current regulatory practices. The latent goals include building trust while safeguarding the principles of justice to ensure technology remains aligned with fundamental legal elements.

Publication Details

Journal
PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Ethics in Legal Decision-Making Bias, Transparency, And Accountability

PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI Ethics in Legal Decision-Making Bias, Transparency, And Accountability

article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems used in legal decision-making processes have created significant ethical challenges through their integration, leading to problems with bias and necessitating better transparency and accountability measures. This paper investigates the discriminatory effects of algorithmic bias by analyzing AI technologies that learn from historical legal datasets containing potential institutional biases. The opacity of AI decision-making, referred to as "black-boxed" decisions, creates complex obstacles to achieving both explainable judgments and fair outcomes. The article examines the absent responsibility structure that arises when legal practitioners utilize AI systems, as it complicates the identification of responsible parties for unfair and erroneous decisions. The author advocates for the development of a robust ethical framework to regulate AI applications in judicial systems, presenting real-world examples and analyzing current regulatory practices. The latent goals include building trust while safeguarding the principles of justice to ensure technology remains aligned with fundamental legal elements.

PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.