Accountability for violations of civil and political rights:redress within and beyond the penal frame

This chapter critically examines accountability mechanisms for civil and political rights violations, challenging the dominance of criminal accountability as the primary response to ‘serious’ human rights breaches, such as torture, extrajudicial killings, and enforced disappearances. While human rights bodies typically mandate criminal prosecution for such violations, this chapter argues that human rights frameworks (could) support a broader range of accountability measures that require states to account for their compliance with civil and political rights. By analysing the core features of the criminal accountability norm − including states’ obligations to criminalise, prosecute, and punish individuals, and to avoid measures obstructing criminal liability − the chapter demonstrates that prioritising criminal accountability may obscure the multi-layered and multi-faceted accountability mechanisms available in relation to civil and political rights. The chapter concludes by considering accountability for both ‘serious’ and ‘standard’ violations of civil and political rights in more transformative rather than punitive terms.

Publication Details

Journal
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Published
2025-10-28
Primary Topic
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accountability for violations of civil and political rights:redress within and beyond the penal frame

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
article

Accountability for violations of civil and political rights:redress within and beyond the penal frame

article en

Abstract

This chapter critically examines accountability mechanisms for civil and political rights violations, challenging the dominance of criminal accountability as the primary response to ‘serious’ human rights breaches, such as torture, extrajudicial killings, and enforced disappearances. While human rights bodies typically mandate criminal prosecution for such violations, this chapter argues that human rights frameworks (could) support a broader range of accountability measures that require states to account for their compliance with civil and political rights. By analysing the core features of the criminal accountability norm − including states’ obligations to criminalise, prosecute, and punish individuals, and to avoid measures obstructing criminal liability − the chapter demonstrates that prioritising criminal accountability may obscure the multi-layered and multi-faceted accountability mechanisms available in relation to civil and political rights. The chapter concludes by considering accountability for both ‘serious’ and ‘standard’ violations of civil and political rights in more transformative rather than punitive terms.

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.