Advancing Social Justice in Code Club Education : Exploring Participation, Pedagogy, and Computer Science Capital

Participation in code club education remains unequal across lines of gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, with underrepresented groups often facing barriers to engagement. This thesis investigates these disparities through a sociological and equity-focused lens by examining children’s access to code clubs and how these clubs are organized to foster social justice. It introduces and applies the Computer Science Capital (CSC) framework, which draws on Bourdieu’s theory of capital and the science capital framework, to explore how access to computing-related social and cultural resources and behavioral patterns influences children’s engagement in computing. Using a mixed-methods research design, the study is structured across four phases involving theory development, a survey, and interviews with code club participants and practitioners. The first and second phases map out the CSC framework, as well as the distribution of CSC among children in code clubs, identifying significant gender differences in computing aspirations and perceptions. Subsequent phases use qualitative methods to deepen the understanding of how children access code club opportunities and how practitioners promote access, equity, and inclusion (AEI) within these learning environments. A survey of 154 code club participants investigated how CSC manifests in practice. The findings show that girls reported lower levels of aspiration and engagement in computing. To further explore the factors influencing participation, interviews were conducted with 17 children. Findings reveal that children’s involvement is shaped not only by their individual interests but by broader social structures, such as family and peer support, and interests in computer games. Therefore, practitioners are encouraged to reflect on how their recruitment and pedagogical practices might unintentionally exclude certain groups of children. The final part of the thesis examined how 17 code club practitioners across eight European countries implement strategies to promote social justice. Effective practices include building partnerships, practicing cultural humility, fostering a fun and supportive learning environment, engaging families, and sharing power with learners. In summary, this thesis contributes to computing education research by developing the CSC framework and demonstrating its practical relevance for recruitment, curriculum design, and pedagogy. It calls for a shift from deficit participation models toward a more intentional and critical educational approaches that acknowledge the uneven distribution of opportunity and seek to strengthen learners’ CS-related capitals. The implications of the findings extend beyond code clubs, offering insights for formal education, policy development, and broader discussions on equity in computing education.

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Social Justice in Code Club Education : Exploring Participation, Pedagogy, and Computer Science Capital

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Teaching and Learning Programming
article

Advancing Social Justice in Code Club Education : Exploring Participation, Pedagogy, and Computer Science Capital

article en

Abstract

Participation in code club education remains unequal across lines of gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, with underrepresented groups often facing barriers to engagement. This thesis investigates these disparities through a sociological and equity-focused lens by examining children’s access to code clubs and how these clubs are organized to foster social justice. It introduces and applies the Computer Science Capital (CSC) framework, which draws on Bourdieu’s theory of capital and the science capital framework, to explore how access to computing-related social and cultural resources and behavioral patterns influences children’s engagement in computing. Using a mixed-methods research design, the study is structured across four phases involving theory development, a survey, and interviews with code club participants and practitioners. The first and second phases map out the CSC framework, as well as the distribution of CSC among children in code clubs, identifying significant gender differences in computing aspirations and perceptions. Subsequent phases use qualitative methods to deepen the understanding of how children access code club opportunities and how practitioners promote access, equity, and inclusion (AEI) within these learning environments. A survey of 154 code club participants investigated how CSC manifests in practice. The findings show that girls reported lower levels of aspiration and engagement in computing. To further explore the factors influencing participation, interviews were conducted with 17 children. Findings reveal that children’s involvement is shaped not only by their individual interests but by broader social structures, such as family and peer support, and interests in computer games. Therefore, practitioners are encouraged to reflect on how their recruitment and pedagogical practices might unintentionally exclude certain groups of children. The final part of the thesis examined how 17 code club practitioners across eight European countries implement strategies to promote social justice. Effective practices include building partnerships, practicing cultural humility, fostering a fun and supportive learning environment, engaging families, and sharing power with learners. In summary, this thesis contributes to computing education research by developing the CSC framework and demonstrating its practical relevance for recruitment, curriculum design, and pedagogy. It calls for a shift from deficit participation models toward a more intentional and critical educational approaches that acknowledge the uneven distribution of opportunity and seek to strengthen learners’ CS-related capitals. The implications of the findings extend beyond code clubs, offering insights for formal education, policy development, and broader discussions on equity in computing education.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Teaching and Learning Programming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.