Acting in Bad Faith: A Qualitative Study on how Religious Centrality in Conflict Incompatibilities Amplifies Civilian Victimization

This thesis examines whether the religious framing of a conflict’s incompatibility by a rebel group amplifies its civilian victimization. To assess this, a comparative case study of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) in the Philippines was conducted. The research makes use of a structured focused comparison to investigate the correlation between religious centrality and patterns of violence against civilians. While the findings indicate that religious framing enhances mobilization and provides ideological justification, its direct connection to civilian mobilization is inconclusive. Alternative explanations, such as external support and command structure, appear significant for the chosen cases. Nonetheless, the research contributes to a further understanding of the nuanced role that religion has on conflict dynamics whilst providing a foundation for future research on leadership and group cohesion in religiously framed conflicts.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Religion, Society, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acting in Bad Faith: A Qualitative Study on how Religious Centrality in Conflict Incompatibilities Amplifies Civilian Victimization

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Religion, Society, and Development
article

Acting in Bad Faith: A Qualitative Study on how Religious Centrality in Conflict Incompatibilities Amplifies Civilian Victimization

article en

Abstract

This thesis examines whether the religious framing of a conflict’s incompatibility by a rebel group amplifies its civilian victimization. To assess this, a comparative case study of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) in the Philippines was conducted. The research makes use of a structured focused comparison to investigate the correlation between religious centrality and patterns of violence against civilians. While the findings indicate that religious framing enhances mobilization and provides ideological justification, its direct connection to civilian mobilization is inconclusive. Alternative explanations, such as external support and command structure, appear significant for the chosen cases. Nonetheless, the research contributes to a further understanding of the nuanced role that religion has on conflict dynamics whilst providing a foundation for future research on leadership and group cohesion in religiously framed conflicts.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
United States Institute of Peace (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Religion, Society, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Acting in Bad Faith: A Qualitative Study on how Religious Centrality in Conflict Incompatibilities Amplifies Civilian Victimization · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS