”Which or witch” – What do you mean? : A study of homophones in English education in Sweden.

Both first- and second language (L1 and L2) speakers of English often experience difficulties in distinguishing homophones. These words serve an important function in facilitating both accurate comprehension and effective communication in English. This essay therefore aims to investigate Swedish high school students’ knowledge of homophones and their teachers’ didactic approaches. Krashen’s input theory and Swain’s output theory were used as frameworks for analysis and interpretation of the data. A mixed-methods approach combining a quantitative test with qualitative semi-structured interviews was employed in the study and the results indicate that students struggle with homophones. The students particularly demonstrated difficulties regarding spelling, which the teachers recognize as an area of difficulty. One element that was notable in the interviews was that “homophones” is referred to in broader terms, such as “confusing words”. The study concludes that explicit instruction and practice is necessary to enhance students’ language production and reduce common errors.

Publication Details

Journal
DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

”Which or witch” – What do you mean? : A study of homophones in English education in Sweden.

DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University)
Multilingual Education and Policy
article

”Which or witch” – What do you mean? : A study of homophones in English education in Sweden.

article en

Abstract

Both first- and second language (L1 and L2) speakers of English often experience difficulties in distinguishing homophones. These words serve an important function in facilitating both accurate comprehension and effective communication in English. This essay therefore aims to investigate Swedish high school students’ knowledge of homophones and their teachers’ didactic approaches. Krashen’s input theory and Swain’s output theory were used as frameworks for analysis and interpretation of the data. A mixed-methods approach combining a quantitative test with qualitative semi-structured interviews was employed in the study and the results indicate that students struggle with homophones. The students particularly demonstrated difficulties regarding spelling, which the teachers recognize as an area of difficulty. One element that was notable in the interviews was that “homophones” is referred to in broader terms, such as “confusing words”. The study concludes that explicit instruction and practice is necessary to enhance students’ language production and reduce common errors.

DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Multilingual Education and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.