What makes INGOs suitable for acting in Global Fishery Governance? : A Discourse Analysis of Intersecting Ecological, Local, and Institutional Structures

This research examines the role of international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) in fishery governance, with a specific focus on the rightfulness of their political engagement. The study specifically assesses their engagement in the dynamic landscape of international fishery governance. As they take on the role as knowledge-producing actors on whom sovereign governments increasingly depend, this research evaluates the legitimacy and effectiveness of standards that, when implemented, prove their rightfulness to govern. Central to this investigation is Foucault’s concept of governmentality, which was used to integrate INGO knowledge into governing practices, as sovereign states alone commonly fall short in exercising power and producing knowledge at the same time. A qualitative methodology that consists of combining discourse analysis with field research draws data from project reports, academic literature, and primary sources, including semi-structured interviews conducted in the Philippines. The purpose of this research is to determine what makes INGOs rightful actors in transnational governance. Ultimately, the analysis concludes that, when measured against clear criteria of legitimacy and effectiveness, INGOs are poised to play a rightful role in biopolitical governance that challenges state-centrism but aligns with national sovereignty.