Ubåtsincidenterna på 1980- talet : En jämförande studie

The aim of this study is to critically investigate how and why the Swedish media narrative surrounding the so called submarine incidents, a string of unexplained foreign submarine intrusions in Swedish waters throughout the 1980’s, has changed between 1983 and 2001. Articles from four major Swedish print news media representing a broad political spectrum are analysed. Framing theory and qualitative text analysis is used to understand how the narrative has changed. Realism is used to explain why these changes have occurred. The end results show that there were significant changes in the media narrative between 1983 and 2001. Media unanimously took the dominant military and political view in 1983 that these incidents were orchestrated by the Soviet Union. In 2001 the narrative was more critical of these views, with a much greater openness to alternative explanations. These changes are explained by the altered geopolitical, security and foreign policy conditions prevalent in the Scandinavian and Baltic regions as a result of the fall of the Soviet Union, as well as by new information suggesting NATO involvement behind these incidents.

Publication Details

Journal
Hogskolan Ihalmstad (Halmstad University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ubåtsincidenterna på 1980- talet : En jämförande studie

Hogskolan Ihalmstad (Halmstad University)
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
article

Ubåtsincidenterna på 1980- talet : En jämförande studie

article en

Abstract

The aim of this study is to critically investigate how and why the Swedish media narrative surrounding the so called submarine incidents, a string of unexplained foreign submarine intrusions in Swedish waters throughout the 1980’s, has changed between 1983 and 2001. Articles from four major Swedish print news media representing a broad political spectrum are analysed. Framing theory and qualitative text analysis is used to understand how the narrative has changed. Realism is used to explain why these changes have occurred. The end results show that there were significant changes in the media narrative between 1983 and 2001. Media unanimously took the dominant military and political view in 1983 that these incidents were orchestrated by the Soviet Union. In 2001 the narrative was more critical of these views, with a much greater openness to alternative explanations. These changes are explained by the altered geopolitical, security and foreign policy conditions prevalent in the Scandinavian and Baltic regions as a result of the fall of the Soviet Union, as well as by new information suggesting NATO involvement behind these incidents.

Hogskolan Ihalmstad (Halmstad University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.